Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33089194›Full record

ArticleClocks & sleep2020

Psychological Screening for Exceptional Environments: Laboratory Circadian Rhythm and Sleep Research.

Stephen A Amira, Brenda L Bressler, Jung Hie Lee, Charles A Czeisler, Jeanne F Duffy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clocks & sleep, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Defining circadian disruption in neurodegenerative disorders.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Stephen A AmiraDivision of Sleep and Circadian Disorders, Departments of Medicine and Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA; S.amira@comcast.net (S.A.A.); blb197@g.Harvard.edu (B.L.B.); jhielee@kangwon.ac.kr (J.H.L.); cacadmin@partners.org (C.A.C.).
Brenda L BresslerDivision of Sleep and Circadian Disorders, Departments of Medicine and Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA; S.amira@comcast.net (S.A.A.); blb197@g.Harvard.edu (B.L.B.); jhielee@kangwon.ac.kr (J.H.L.); cacadmin@partners.org (C.A.C.).
Jung Hie LeeDivision of Sleep and Circadian Disorders, Departments of Medicine and Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA; S.amira@comcast.net (S.A.A.); blb197@g.Harvard.edu (B.L.B.); jhielee@kangwon.ac.kr (J.H.L.); cacadmin@partners.org (C.A.C.).
Charles A CzeislerDivision of Sleep and Circadian Disorders, Departments of Medicine and Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA; S.amira@comcast.net (S.A.A.); blb197@g.Harvard.edu (B.L.B.); jhielee@kangwon.ac.kr (J.H.L.); cacadmin@partners.org (C.A.C.).
Jeanne F DuffyDivision of Sleep and Circadian Disorders, Departments of Medicine and Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA; S.amira@comcast.net (S.A.A.); blb197@g.Harvard.edu (B.L.B.); jhielee@kangwon.ac.kr (J.H.L.); cacadmin@partners.org (C.A.C.).ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4177-4179

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Selecting participants who constitute a representative sample while protecting them from potential adverse outcomes is a concern for clinical researchers. Our research group conducts deep phenotyping studies of the circadian timing system and sleep-wake regulation in long (up to 3 months) laboratory experiments, similar in many ways to "exceptional environment" conditions. Here, we describe the psychological screening process we have used for more than 30 years. We outline our "Select In" and "Select Out" measures within three major categories: psychological, psychophysiological, and psychosocial factors. We describe the screening process, inclusion-exclusion criteria on standard questionnaires, and clinical interview questions. We also describe how we manage the exclusion process during screening, ensure continued psychological health during the laboratory study, and manage study terminations. We present data from one recent study, outlining the number of individuals excluded at each stage of the process and present subjective mood data from the included individuals, showing the trajectory of mood across the five-week laboratory study and the end-of-study debriefing, during which the participants rated their comfort with various aspects of the study and their willingness to return for a future study. While designed for our inpatient research studies, elements of these procedures may also be useful for selecting individuals for other exceptional environments.

Indexed as

chronobiologymoodpsychophysiologicalselection criteria

Identifiers

PMID33089194
PMCPMC7445832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.