Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33089193›Full record

ArticleClocks & sleep2020

Comparing the Effects of FIFO/DIDO Workers Being Home versus Away on Sleep and Loneliness for Partners of Australian Mining Workers.

Kerrie-Ann I Wilson, Sally A Ferguson, Amanda Rebar, Kristie-Lee Alfrey, Grace E Vincent

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clocks & sleep, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kerrie-Ann I WilsonCentral Queensland University, Appleton Institute of Behavioural Science, Adelaide 5034, South Australia, Australia; kerrieannwilson@gmail.com (K.-a.I.W.); sally.ferguson@cqu.edu.au (S.A.F.); a.rebar@cqu.edu.au (A.R.); k.alfrey@cqumail.com (K.-L.A.).
Sally A FergusonCentral Queensland University, Appleton Institute of Behavioural Science, Adelaide 5034, South Australia, Australia; kerrieannwilson@gmail.com (K.-a.I.W.); sally.ferguson@cqu.edu.au (S.A.F.); a.rebar@cqu.edu.au (A.R.); k.alfrey@cqumail.com (K.-L.A.).
Amanda RebarCentral Queensland University, Appleton Institute of Behavioural Science, Adelaide 5034, South Australia, Australia; kerrieannwilson@gmail.com (K.-a.I.W.); sally.ferguson@cqu.edu.au (S.A.F.); a.rebar@cqu.edu.au (A.R.); k.alfrey@cqumail.com (K.-L.A.).ORCID 0000-0003-3164-993X
Kristie-Lee AlfreyCentral Queensland University, Appleton Institute of Behavioural Science, Adelaide 5034, South Australia, Australia; kerrieannwilson@gmail.com (K.-a.I.W.); sally.ferguson@cqu.edu.au (S.A.F.); a.rebar@cqu.edu.au (A.R.); k.alfrey@cqumail.com (K.-L.A.).ORCID 0000-0001-6004-3406
Grace E VincentCentral Queensland University, Appleton Institute of Behavioural Science, Adelaide 5034, South Australia, Australia; kerrieannwilson@gmail.com (K.-a.I.W.); sally.ferguson@cqu.edu.au (S.A.F.); a.rebar@cqu.edu.au (A.R.); k.alfrey@cqumail.com (K.-L.A.).ORCID 0000-0002-7036-7823

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fly in Fly out/Drive in Drive out (FIFO/DIDO) is a prevalent work arrangement in the Australian mining industry and has been associated with adverse outcomes such as psychological stress, sleep disturbances, fatigue, and work/life interference. FIFO/DIDO work arrangements have the potential to not only impact the FIFO/DIDO worker, but also the partner of the FIFO/DIDO worker. However, there is sparse empirical evidence on the impact of FIFO/DIDO work arrangements on partners' sleep and subsequent performance. Therefore, the primary aim of this study was to describe and compare partners' sleep quality, sleep duration, sleepiness, and loneliness when the FIFO/DIDO workers were at home (off-shift) and away (on-shift). A secondary aim of this study was to examine whether differences in partners' sleep quality and sleep duration as a result of FIFO/DIDO worker's absence could be partially explained through the presence of dependents in the home, relationship duration, chronotype, duration in a FIFO/DIDO role, and loneliness. Self-reported questionnaires were completed by 195 female and 4 male participants, mostly aged between 18 and 44 years and who had been in a relationship with a FIFO/DIDO mining worker for more than five years. Of note, most participants subjectively reported poor sleep quality, insufficient sleep duration, excessive sleepiness, and moderate to extreme loneliness compared to the general population regardless of whether the FIFO/DIDO workers were at home or away. Compared to when the FIFO/DIDO workers were at home, partners experienced reduced sleep quality and increased loneliness when the FIFO/DIDO workers were away. Secondary analyses revealed that loneliness may partially underpin the negative effect that FIFO/DIDO workers' absence has on sleep quality. Further research is needed to understand the factors that contribute to poor sleep quality, insufficient sleep duration, excessive sleepiness, and loneliness of FIFO/DIDO partners to inform appropriate strategies to support FIFO/DIDO partners' health and wellbeing not only in the mining population, but other industries that incorporate similar FIFO/DIDO work arrangements (e.g., emergency services, offshore drilling, and transport).

Indexed as

co-sleepingfly in fly out: drive in drive out FIFO/DIDOlonelinessminingsleep durationsleepinesssleep quality

Identifiers

PMID33089193
PMCPMC7445831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.