Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33089130›Full record

ArticleWater research X2020

Wastewater treatment efficacy evaluated with

Peta A Neale, Jake W O'Brien, Lisa Glauch, Maria König, Martin Krauss, Jochen F Mueller, Ben Tscharke, Beate I Escher

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Water research X, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Peta A NealeAustralian Rivers Institute, School of Environment and Science, Griffith University, Southport, QLD, 4222, Australia.
Jake W O'BrienQAEHS - Queensland Alliance for Environmental Health Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, 4102, Australia.
Lisa GlauchUFZ - Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, 04318, Leipzig, Germany.
Maria KönigUFZ - Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, 04318, Leipzig, Germany.
Martin KraussUFZ - Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, 04318, Leipzig, Germany.
Jochen F MuellerQAEHS - Queensland Alliance for Environmental Health Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, 4102, Australia.
Ben TscharkeQAEHS - Queensland Alliance for Environmental Health Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, 4102, Australia.
Beate I EscherAustralian Rivers Institute, School of Environment and Science, Griffith University, Southport, QLD, 4222, Australia.
University of Queensland · AUHelmholtz Centre for Environmental Research · DEUniversity of Tübingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bioassays show promise as a complementary approach to chemical analysis to assess the efficacy of wastewater treatment processes as they can detect the mixture effects of all bioactive chemicals in a sample. We investigated the treatment efficacy of ten Australian wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) covering 42% of the national population over seven consecutive days. Solid-phase extracts of influent and effluent were subjected to an

Indexed as

AustraliaEffect removalIceberg modellingIn vitro bioassayWastewater treatment plant

Identifiers

PMID33089130
PMCPMC7559864
OpenAlexW3090042745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.