ArticleTurkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation2020
The adaptation of the Turkish version of the Assessment of Knowledge in Ankylosing Spondylitis Patients by a Self-Administered Questionnaire.
Article in Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe aim of this study was to adapt the Assessment of Knowledge in Ankylosing Spondylitis Patients by a Self-Administered Questionnaire for the Turkish ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients. PATIENTS AND
methodsBetween May 2016 and December 2016, a total of 100 AS patients (72 males, 28 females; mean age 43.4 years; range, 21 to 73 years) were included in the study. A forward (into Turkish) and backward translation of the questionnaire was performed. Reliability was evaluated using the Cronbach alpha (α) value, test-retest reliability, and intra-class correlations (ICCs). The correlations with demographic data including age, sex, time since diagnosis, and education status and with the disease-specific assessments including Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), and the Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life (ASQOL) questionnaire were investigated.
resultsThe Turkish version of the questionnaire showed a good reliability (Cronbach-α: >0.70, ICC: >0.90). A significant correlation was found with the education status (p<0.001). However, no significant correlation was observed between the questionnaire and the other parameters (p>0.05).
conclusionOur study results show that the Turkish version of the questionnaire seems to be reliable for use in Turkish AS patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.