Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33089003›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2020

Effectiveness of a brief manualized intervention, Managing Cancer and Living Meaningfully (CALM), adapted to the Italian cancer care setting: Study protocol for a single-blinded randomized controlled trial.

Rosangela Caruso, Maria Giulia Nanni, Gary Rodin, Sarah Hales, Carmine Malfitano, Silvia De Padova, Tatiana Bertelli, Martino Belvederi Murri, Andrea Bovero, Marco Miniotti and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Effects of CALM intervention on neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), fear of cancer recurrence and quality of life in patients with lung cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Rosangela CarusoInstitute of Psychiatry, Department of Biomedical and Specialty Surgical Sciences, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Maria Giulia NanniInstitute of Psychiatry, Department of Biomedical and Specialty Surgical Sciences, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Gary RodinDepartment of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, 16th Floor, 610 University Avenue, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada.
Sarah HalesDepartment of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, 16th Floor, 610 University Avenue, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada.
Carmine MalfitanoDepartment of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, 16th Floor, 610 University Avenue, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada.
Silvia De PadovaPsycho-Oncology Unit, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per Lo Studio e La Cura Dei Tumori (IRST), IRCCS, Meldola, Italy.
Tatiana BertelliPsycho-Oncology Unit, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per Lo Studio e La Cura Dei Tumori (IRST), IRCCS, Meldola, Italy.
Martino Belvederi MurriInstitute of Psychiatry, Department of Biomedical and Specialty Surgical Sciences, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Andrea BoveroClinical Psychology Unit, Department of Neuroscience, University of Turin, "Città Della Salute e Della Scienza" Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Marco MiniottiClinical Psychology Unit, Department of Neuroscience, University of Turin, "Città Della Salute e Della Scienza" Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Paolo LeombruniClinical Psychology Unit, Department of Neuroscience, University of Turin, "Città Della Salute e Della Scienza" Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Luigi ZerbinatiInstitute of Psychiatry, Department of Biomedical and Specialty Surgical Sciences, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Silvana SabatoInstitute of Psychiatry, Department of Biomedical and Specialty Surgical Sciences, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Luigi GrassiInstitute of Psychiatry, Department of Biomedical and Specialty Surgical Sciences, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
CALM-Italian Study
University of Ferrara · ITUniversity Health Network · CAUniversity of Turin · ITIstituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with advanced cancer suffer from psychosocial distress that may impair quality of life and that may be ameliorated by psychotherapeutic treatment. We describe here the methodology of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to assess the effectiveness of a novel, brief, semi-structured psychotherapeutic intervention to reduce distress and increase well-being in patients with advanced or metastatic cancer. The intervention, called Managing Cancer and Living Meaningfully (CALM), was originally developed in Canada and we are now testing its Italian adaptation (CALM-IT). The study is a single-blinded phase III RCT with assessment at baseline, 3 and 6 months with two conditions: CALM-IT versus a nonspecific supportive intervention (SPI). Eligibility criteria include: ≥ 18 years of age; fluency in the Italian language; no cognitive deficit, and diagnosis of advanced or metastatic cancer with an expected survival of 12-18 months. CALM-IT includes up to 12 sessions, delivered over 6 months and covers 4 domains: i) Symptom Management and Communication with Health Care Providers; ii) Changes in Self and Relations with Close Others; iii) Sense of Meaning and Purpose; and iv) the Future and Mortality. The primary outcome is difference in severity of depressive symptoms between treatment arm and the primary endpoint is 6 months. The secondary endpoint is 3 months and secondary outcomes are: generalized anxiety, distress about dying and death, demoralization, spiritual well-being, attachment security, posttraumatic growth, communication with partners, quality of life, and satisfaction with clinical care. If shown to be effective, CALM-IT can be implemented nationally to relieve distress and to promote psychological well-being in patients with advanced cancer.

Indexed as

Attachment securityCALMClinical trialDeath anxietyEnd-of-life-interventionExistentialPalliative carePsychotherapyRandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID33089003
PMCPMC7566943
OpenAlexW3091987920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.