Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33089000›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of bioprinting2020

Engineering a Model to Study Viral Infections: Bioprinting, Microfluidics, and Organoids to Defeat Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).

Anastasia Shpichka, Polina Bikmulina, Maria Peshkova, Nastasia Kosheleva, Irina Zurina, Ensieh Zahmatkesh, Niloofar Khoshdel-Rad, Marina Lipina, Elena Golubeva, Denis Butnaru and 3 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of bioprinting, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Imaging Techniques: Essential Tools for the Study of SARS-CoV-2 Infection.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Antimicrobial 3D Printed Objects in the Fight Against Pandemics.3D printing and additive manufacturing · 2021
    Article
  16. Recent Advances of COVID-19 Modeling Based on Regenerative Medicine.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  17. Organoids: a novel modality in disease modeling.Bio-design and manufacturing · 2021
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Anastasia ShpichkaDepartment of Advanced Biomaterials, Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.
Polina BikmulinaDepartment of Advanced Biomaterials, Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.
Maria PeshkovaDepartment of Advanced Biomaterials, Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.
Nastasia KoshelevaDepartment of Molecular and Cell Pathophysiology, FSBSI Institute of General Pathology and Pathophysiology, Moscow, Russia.
Irina ZurinaDepartment of Advanced Biomaterials, Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.
Ensieh ZahmatkeshDepartment of Regenerative Medicine, Cell Science Research Center, Royan Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Technology, ACECR, Tehran, Iran.
Niloofar Khoshdel-RadDepartment of Regenerative Medicine, Cell Science Research Center, Royan Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Technology, ACECR, Tehran, Iran.
Marina LipinaDepartment of Traumatology, Orthopedics and Disaster Surgery, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.
Elena GolubevaDepartment of Chemistry, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.
Denis ButnaruRector's Office, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.
Andrei SvistunovRector's Office, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.
Massoud VosoughDepartment of Regenerative Medicine, Cell Science Research Center, Royan Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Technology, ACECR, Tehran, Iran.
Peter TimashevDepartment of Advanced Biomaterials, Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.
Lomonosov Moscow State University · RUAcademic Center for Education, Culture and Research · IRRoyan Institute · IRSechenov University · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While the number of studies related to severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is constantly growing, it is essential to provide a framework of modeling viral infections. Therefore, this review aims to describe the background presented by earlier used models for viral studies and an approach to design an "ideal" tissue model for SARS-CoV-2 infection. Due to the previous successful achievements in antiviral research and tissue engineering, combining the emerging techniques such as bioprinting, microfluidics, and organoid formation are considered to be one of the best approaches to form

Indexed as

BioprintingBody-on-a-chipCoronavirusCoronavirus disease 2019microfluidicsOrganoidsSevere acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus 2Tissue modelsViral infection

Identifiers

PMID33089000
PMCPMC7557357
OpenAlexW3082147241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.