ArticleHeliyon2020
Effect of stimulation timing on testing voluntary muscle force generation.
Article in Heliyon, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is associated with increased corticospinal excitability and rate of force development.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2026Article
- On the reliability and validity of central fatigue determination.European journal of applied physiology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe interpolated twitch technique (ITT) is a ubiquitous test for assessing the level of voluntary muscle force generation, in which muscle twitches are evoked via percutaneous electrical stimulation. Traditionally, the stimulation timing during the ITT is not computer-controlled and usually delivered from 5 to 10 s after the maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) of the potentiated muscle.
methodsIn this work, we evaluated the sizes of the evoked twitches in the lower limb with different controlled stimulation time delays with respect to the MVC of the ankle plantar flexors. Fifteen healthy participants were included. We recorded the un-potentiated muscle twitch amplitudes at rest in response to doublet supramaximal stimulation of the tibial nerve, superimposed twitches (SITs) at three different delays from the beginning of the MVC force plateau (0.1, 0.75, and 1.5 s), and resting twitches in the potentiated muscle at four different delays once the MVC was finished (0.1, 2.5, 5.0, and 10.0 s).
resultsThe magnitude of the SITs did not vary among the delays tested but varied among the potentiated resting twitch (PRT) amplitudes, with 2.5 s being largest and 0.1 s being the smallest. Remarkably, the resting twitch amplitudes reduced during the session despite the long rest periods between MVCs (5 min).
conclusionWe conclude that proper control of the stimulation timing is mandatory to increase the sensitivity of the ITT, and a 2.5 s delay from the end of the MVC is recommended for the PRT. Controlling the development of fatigue, which can be intrinsic to testing with repeated MVCs, is also essential. We recommend reducing the number of MVC repetitions and increasing the rest periods between them.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.