Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33088951›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2020

Effect of stimulation timing on testing voluntary muscle force generation.

Antonio Madrid, Elena Madinabeitia-Mancebo, Verónica Robles-García, Marcelo Chouza-Insua, Javier Cudeiro, Pablo Arias

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 53% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. On the reliability and validity of central fatigue determination.European journal of applied physiology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Antonio MadridUniversidade da Coruña, NEUROcom (Neuroscience and Motor Control Group) and Biomedical Institute of A Coruña (INIBIC), Department of Physiotherapy, Medicine and Biomedical Sciences and INEF Galicia, A Coruña Spain.
Elena Madinabeitia-ManceboUniversidade da Coruña, NEUROcom (Neuroscience and Motor Control Group) and Biomedical Institute of A Coruña (INIBIC), Department of Physiotherapy, Medicine and Biomedical Sciences and INEF Galicia, A Coruña Spain.
Verónica Robles-GarcíaUniversidade da Coruña, NEUROcom (Neuroscience and Motor Control Group) and Biomedical Institute of A Coruña (INIBIC), Department of Physiotherapy, Medicine and Biomedical Sciences and INEF Galicia, A Coruña Spain.
Marcelo Chouza-InsuaUniversidade da Coruña, NEUROcom (Neuroscience and Motor Control Group) and Biomedical Institute of A Coruña (INIBIC), Department of Physiotherapy, Medicine and Biomedical Sciences and INEF Galicia, A Coruña Spain.
Javier CudeiroUniversidade da Coruña, NEUROcom (Neuroscience and Motor Control Group) and Biomedical Institute of A Coruña (INIBIC), Department of Physiotherapy, Medicine and Biomedical Sciences and INEF Galicia, A Coruña Spain.
Pablo AriasUniversidade da Coruña, NEUROcom (Neuroscience and Motor Control Group) and Biomedical Institute of A Coruña (INIBIC), Department of Physiotherapy, Medicine and Biomedical Sciences and INEF Galicia, A Coruña Spain.
Universidade da Coruña · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe interpolated twitch technique (ITT) is a ubiquitous test for assessing the level of voluntary muscle force generation, in which muscle twitches are evoked via percutaneous electrical stimulation. Traditionally, the stimulation timing during the ITT is not computer-controlled and usually delivered from 5 to 10 s after the maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) of the potentiated muscle.

methodsIn this work, we evaluated the sizes of the evoked twitches in the lower limb with different controlled stimulation time delays with respect to the MVC of the ankle plantar flexors. Fifteen healthy participants were included. We recorded the un-potentiated muscle twitch amplitudes at rest in response to doublet supramaximal stimulation of the tibial nerve, superimposed twitches (SITs) at three different delays from the beginning of the MVC force plateau (0.1, 0.75, and 1.5 s), and resting twitches in the potentiated muscle at four different delays once the MVC was finished (0.1, 2.5, 5.0, and 10.0 s).

resultsThe magnitude of the SITs did not vary among the delays tested but varied among the potentiated resting twitch (PRT) amplitudes, with 2.5 s being largest and 0.1 s being the smallest. Remarkably, the resting twitch amplitudes reduced during the session despite the long rest periods between MVCs (5 min).

conclusionWe conclude that proper control of the stimulation timing is mandatory to increase the sensitivity of the ITT, and a 2.5 s delay from the end of the MVC is recommended for the PRT. Controlling the development of fatigue, which can be intrinsic to testing with repeated MVCs, is also essential. We recommend reducing the number of MVC repetitions and increasing the rest periods between them.

Indexed as

Behavioral neuroscienceBiomechanicsCognitive neuroscienceInterpolation twitch techniqueMuscleMuscle fatigueMuscle forcePhysiologySystems neuroscience

Identifiers

PMID33088951
PMCPMC7560577
OpenAlexW3092579589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.