Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33088917›Full record

SynthesisGlobal health research and policy2020

The effects of the primary health care providers' prescription behavior interventions to improve the rational use of antibiotics: a systematic review.

Lu Yao, Jia Yin, Ruiting Huo, Ding Yang, Liyan Shen, Shuqin Wen, Qiang Sun

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Global health research and policy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Antimicrobial stewardship interventions in hospitalized adults with community-acquired pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lu YaoCentre for Health Management and Policy Research, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012 China.
Jia YinCentre for Health Management and Policy Research, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012 China.
Ruiting HuoCentre for Health Management and Policy Research, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012 China.
Ding YangCentre for Health Management and Policy Research, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012 China.
Liyan ShenCentre for Health Management and Policy Research, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012 China.
Shuqin WenCentre for Health Management and Policy Research, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012 China.
Qiang SunCentre for Health Management and Policy Research, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012 China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Irrational antibiotics use in clinical prescription, especially in primary health care (PHC) is accelerating the spread of antibiotics resistance (ABR) around the world. It may be greatly useful to improve the rational use of antibiotics by effectively intervening providers' prescription behaviors in PHC. This study aimed to systematically review the interventions targeted to providers' prescription behaviors in PHC and its' effects on improving the rational use of antibiotics. Methods: The literatures were searched in Ovid Medline, Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and two Chinese databases with a time limit from January 1st, 1998 to December 1st, 2018. The articles included in our review were randomized control trial, controlled before-and-after studies and interrupted time series, and the main outcomes measured in these articles were providers' prescription behaviors. The Cochrane Collaboration criteria were used to assess the risk of bias of the studies by two reviewers. Narrative analysis was performed to analyze the effect size of interventions. Results: A total of 4422 studies were identified in this study and 17 of them were included in the review. Among 17 included studies, 13 studies were conducted in the Europe or in the United States, and the rest were conducted in low-income and-middle-income countries (LMICs). According to the Cochrane Collaboration criteria, 12 studies had high risk of bias and 5 studies had medium risk of bias. There was moderate-strength evidence that interventions targeted to improve the providers' prescription behaviors in PHC decreased the antibiotics prescribing and improved the rational use of antibiotics. Conclusions: Interventions targeted PHC providers' prescription behaviours could be an effective way to decrease the use of antibiotics in PHC and to promote the rational use of antibiotics. However, we cannot compare the effects between different interventions because of heterogeneity of interventions and outcome measures.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsDrug PrescriptionsHealth PersonnelHumansPrimary Health CareAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID33088917
PMCPMC7568391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.