ArticleIndian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India2020
A Study to Determine Various Factors Influencing Auditory Outcomes in Paediatric Cochlear Implantation.
Article in Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Outcomes and prognostic factors in prelingually sensorineural deaf children with cerebral white matter lesions following cochlear implantation: a multicenter, retrospective study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Cross-cultural adaptation of the Nijmegen cochlear implant questionnaire into Turkish language: validity, reliability and effects of demographic variables.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To evaluate various factors that affects the auditory outcomes in pediatric patients with bilateral profound sensorineural hearing loss who underwent unilateral cochlear implantation. 50 prelingually deaf pediatric patients aged between 1 and 6 years with bilateral profound sensorineural hearing loss who underwent unilateral cochlear implantation between January 2016 and June 2018 at our tertiary centre were included in this study. Auditory performance was measured using revised categories of auditory performance score at 1 year post cochlear implantation. A Statistical analysis of several factors was performed to reveal any significant relation with outcomes of cochlear implantation. The results of the study showed that patients with younger age at implantation, patient who used hearing aid prior to surgery and patients with normal cochlear morphology had better auditory outcomes post cochlear implantation than their counter group and are the factors which have positive effect on the cochlear implantation outcomes, whereas factors which did not showed any significant relation with the auditory outcomes of cochlear implantation are gender, consanguinity and birth hypoxia. Age at implantation, use of hearing aid prior to surgery and cochlear morphology are the factors with direct impact on the outcomes of cochlear implant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.