Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33088611›Full record

ArticleIEEE International Symposium on Parallel & Distributed Processing, Workshops and Phd Forum : [proceedings]. IEEE International Symposium on Parallel & Distributed Processing, Workshops and Phd Forum2020

Optimizing High-Performance Computing Systems for Biomedical Workloads.

Patricia Kovatch, Lili Gai, Hyung Min Cho, Eugene Fluder, Dansha Jiang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE International Symposium on Parallel & Distributed Processing, Workshops and Phd Forum : [proceedings]. IEEE International Symposium on Parallel & Distributed Processing, Workshops and Phd Forum, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Long-term exposure to wildfire-related PMThe Lancet. Oncology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Biology and medicine in the landscape of quantum advantages.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Patricia KovatchGenetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8368-1742
Lili GaiOffice of the Dean, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA.
Hyung Min ChoOffice of the Dean, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA.
Eugene FluderOffice of the Dean, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA.
Dansha JiangOffice of the Dean, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA.

Funding

Big Omics Data Engine 2 SupercomputerS10OD026880 · OD · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI KOVATCH, PATRICIA · 2019 to 2019
$2.0M
Transforming Genomics with 5 PB Big Omics Data Engine Cray CS300-AC SupercomputerS10OD018522 · OD · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI KOVATCH, PATRICIA · 2014 to 2014
$1.9M
NIH HHS S10 OD018522NIH HHS S10 OD026880
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The productivity of computational biologists is limited by the speed of their workflows and subsequent overall job throughput. Because most biomedical researchers are focused on better understanding scientific phenomena rather than developing and optimizing code, a computing and data system implemented in an adventitious and/or non-optimized manner can impede the progress of scientific discovery. In our experience, most computational, life-science applications do not generally leverage the full capabilities of high-performance computing, so tuning a system for these applications is especially critical. To optimize a system effectively, systems staff must understand the effects of the applications on the system. Effective stewardship of the system includes an analysis of the impact of the applications on the compute cores, file system, resource manager and queuing policies. The resulting improved system design, and enactment of a sustainability plan, help to enable a long-term resource for productive computational and data science. We present a case study of a typical biomedical computational workload at a leading academic medical center supporting over $100 million per year in computational biology research. Over the past eight years, our high-performance computing system has enabled over 900 biomedical publications in four major areas: genetics and population analysis, gene expression, machine learning, and structural and chemical biology. We have upgraded the system several times in response to trends, actual usage, and user feedback. Major components crucial to this evolution include scheduling structure and policies, memory size, compute type and speed, parallel file system capabilities, and deployment of cloud technologies. We evolved a 70 teraflop machine to a 1.4 petaflop machine in seven years and grew our user base nearly 10-fold. For long-term stability and sustainability, we established a chargeback fee structure. Our overarching guiding principle for each progression has been to increase scientific throughput and enable enhanced scientific fidelity with minimal impact to existing user workflows or code. This highly-constrained system optimization has presented unique challenges, leading us to adopt new approaches to provide constructive pathways forward. We share our practical strategies resulting from our ongoing growth and assessments.

Indexed as

cloud technologiescomputational biologygenomicshigh performance computingparallel file systemsschedulingsustainabilitysystem optimization

Identifiers

PMID33088611
PMCPMC7575271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.