Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33088583›Full record

ArticleBMJ open sport & exercise medicine2020

Feasibility randomised controlled trial examining the effects of the Anti-Doping Values in Coach Education (ADVICE) mobile application on doping knowledge and attitudes towards doping among grassroots coaches.

Adam Robert Nicholls, Lucas R W Fairs, Mar Plata-Andrés, Richard Bailey, Edward Cope, Daniel Madigan, Katrin Koenen, Iva Glibo, Nikolaos C Theodorou, Jean-Francois Laurent and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open sport & exercise medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Adam Robert NichollsDepartment of Sport, Health, and Exercise Science, University of Hull, Hull, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8883-5445
Lucas R W FairsDepartment of Sport, Health, and Exercise Science, University of Hull, Hull, UK.
Mar Plata-AndrésAgencia Española de Protección de la Salud en el Deporte, Madrid, Spain.
Richard BaileyRBES Ltd, Berlin, Germany.
Edward CopeSchool of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK.
Daniel MadiganSchool of Sport, York Saint John University, York, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9937-1818
Katrin KoenenSchool of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Senate of Berlin, Berlin, UK.
Iva GliboDepartment of Sport and Health Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Munchen, Germany.
Nikolaos C TheodorouAthens, Greece.
Jean-Francois LaurentThe Association for International Sport for All, Frankfurt, Germany.
Gaetan GarciaThe Association for International Sport for All, Frankfurt, Germany.
Benoit ChanalAgence Française de Lutte Contre le Dopage, Paris, France.
University of Hull · GBAgence française de lutte contre le dopage · FRAgencia Española de Consumo, Seguridad Alimentaría y Nutrición · ESLoughborough University · GBTechnical University of Munich · DEYork St John University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesSports coaches are influential in whether athletes dope, but receive very little antidoping education, particularly within entry-level coaching qualifications. We tested the feasibility of an antidoping intervention, delivered via a mobile application, which was designed to increase coaches' knowledge of doping and to reduce favourable doping attitudes.

methodsA two-arm randomised controlled trial, with grassroots coaches who coach young amateur athletes aged between 14 and 18 years of age, was conducted. The Anti-Doping Values in Coach Education (ADVICE) mobile application included modules on fair play, substances, nutritional supplements, rules and leadership. The primary outcome was the change in doping knowledge, 6 weeks after receiving the mobile application. The secondary outcome was changes in doping attitudes.

resultsGrassroots coaches (n=200; aged between 18 and 71 years, with between 1 and 42 years of coaching experience) from 29 different countries completed baseline assessments, and 85 completed follow-up assessments, and were included in mixed analysis of variance analyses. The intervention increased coaches' knowledge about doping and also reduced favourable doping attitudes in the experimental arm.

conclusionThe ADVICE mobile application is a feasible method for delivering and increasing grassroots coaches' knowledge of banned substances and the potential side effects of doping. Mobile application-based resources could facilitate a much wider dissemination of antidoping education.

Indexed as

AdolescentDopingDrug controlDrug use

Identifiers

PMID33088583
PMCPMC7547541
OpenAlexW3091428431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.