Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33088351›Full record

ArticleNuclear medicine and molecular imaging2020

Recent Survey of Effective Doses of F-18 FDG Torso PET/CT in Korea and the Current Recommendations for CT Protocols of PET/CT.

Ari Chong, Jung Mi Park, Kyoungjune Pak, Yong-Il Kim, Hyun Woo Kwon, Eun Seong Lee, Ki Pyo Nam, Ho-Young Lee, Hong Jae Lee, Ik Dong Yoo and 8 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The Usefulness ofDementia and neurocognitive disorders · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Ari ChongDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Chosun University Hospital, Gwangju, South Korea.
Jung Mi ParkDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon-si, Gyeonggi-do Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-7556-5175
Kyoungjune PakDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, South Korea.
Yong-Il KimDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea.
Hyun Woo KwonDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Eun Seong LeeDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Korea University Medical Center, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Ki Pyo NamDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea.
Ho-Young LeeDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea.
Hong Jae LeeDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Ik Dong YooDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Cheonan Hospital, Cheonan, South Korea.
Jae Seon EoDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Ji Young KimDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Guri-si, South Korea.
Joon-Kee YoonDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Ajou University Medical Center, Suwon, South Korea.
Kyeong Min KimDivision of Applied RI, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Seoul, South Korea.
Seong Min KimDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, South Korea.
Tae-Sung KimDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, National Cancer Center, Goyang-si, South Korea.
Quality Control Committee of the Korean Society of Nuclear Medicine (KSNM)
Korean Society of Nuclear Medicine Technology (KSNMT)
Korea University Medical Center · KRAsan Medical Center · KRSeoul National University Hospital · KRSoonchunhyang University · KRAjou University · KRChosun University Hospital · KRChungnam National University Hospital · KRHanyang University Guri Hospital · KRKorea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences · KRNational Cancer Center · KRPusan National University Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to construct a database of the effective doses (ED) from F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) torso positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in Korea to provide data that supports the reduction of the CT dose of PET/CT and optimization of PET/CT protocols in Korea.

methodsWe investigated data of ED and CT parameters of FDG PET/CT. The data were analyzed by body weight groups.

resultsA total of 31 hospitals participated in the survey (99 adults). The mean total EDs (± SD) were 8.77 ± 2.76, 10.93 ± 3.14, and 12.57 ± 3.79 mSv for the 55-, 70-, and 85-kg groups, respectively. The FDG EDs were 4.80 ± 0.98, 6.05 ± 1.15, and 6.89 ± 1.52 mSv, and the CT EDs were 4.00 ± 2.12, 4.88 ± 2.51, and 5.68 ± 2.89 mSv, respectively. Of the enrolled hospitals, 54.5% used ultra-low-dose CT protocols, and their CT ED was significantly lower than low-dose CT group in all groups (2.9 ± 1.0, 3.2 ± 1.1, and 3.3 ± 1.0 mSv vs. 6.6 ± 1.6, 7.2 ± 2.1, and 7.9 ± 2.2 mSv, all

conclusionsThese results and current recommendations can be helpful for optimizing PET/CT diagnostic reference level (DRL) and reducing unnecessary PET/CT radiation exposure.

Indexed as

18F-FDGCTEffective doseGuidelinesPET/CT

Identifiers

PMID33088351
PMCPMC7560676
OpenAlexW3043940032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.