Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33088291›Full record

ReviewRevista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health2020

Theoretical and practical challenges of proportionate universalism: a review.

Florence Francis-Oliviero, Linda Cambon, Jérôme Wittwer, Michael Marmot, François Alla

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
44.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Advancing equity and value in United States healthcare: an umbrella review.International journal for equity in health · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. A systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of interventions to increase cervical cancer screening among underserved women in Europe.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Addressing Access Barriers in Rural America: A Mixed-Methods Study of Wisconsin's Family Resource Centers.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Refined utilitarianism in practice: reinterpreting the ethical foundations of the NHS.Philosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Florence Francis-OlivieroUniversity of Bordeaux Bordeaux France University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Linda CambonUniversity of Bordeaux Bordeaux France University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Jérôme WittwerUniversity of Bordeaux Bordeaux France University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Michael MarmotInstitute of Health Equity at the University College London London United Kingdom Institute of Health Equity at the University College London, London, United Kingdom.
François AllaUniversity of Bordeaux Bordeaux France University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Université de Bordeaux · FRUniversity College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIn 2010, the principle of proportionate universalism (PU) has been proposed as a solution to reduce health inequalities. It had a great resonance but does not seem to have been widely applied and no guidelines exist on how to implement it.The two specific objectives of this scoping review were: (1) to describe the theoretical context in which PU was established, (2) to describe how researchers apply PU and related methodological issues.

methodsWe searched for all articles published until 6

resultsThis review of 55 articles allowed us a global vision around the question of PU regarding its theoretical foundations and practical implementation. PU principle is rooted in the social theories of universalism and targeting. It proposes to link these two aspects in order to achieve an effective reduction of health inequalities. Regarding practical implementation, PU interventions were rare and led to different interpretations. There are still many methodological and ethical challenges regarding conception and evaluation of PU interventions, including how to apply proportionality, and identification of needs.

conclusionThis review mapped available scientific literature on PU and its related concepts. PU principle originates from social theories. As highlighted by authors who implemented PU interventions, application raises many challenges from design to evaluation. Analysis of PU applications provided in this review answered to some of them but remaining methodological challenges could be addressed in further research.

Indexed as

Health equityhealth policysocioeconomic factors

Identifiers

PMID33088291
PMCPMC7556407
OpenAlexW3093568024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.