Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33088180›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental health insights2020

Determinants of Hand Hygiene Practice at Critical Times among Food Handlers in Educational Institutions of the Sagnarigu Municipality of Ghana: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Kingsley E Amegah, Henry O Addo, Mary E Ashinyo, Loveland Fiagbe, Serene Akpanya, Samuel K Akoriyea, S Dajan Dubik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental health insights, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Prevalence ofFrontiers in public health · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kingsley E AmegahDepartment of Health Information, Hohoe Municipal Hospital, Hohoe, Ghana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5251-1166
Henry O AddoDepartment of Animal Biology and Conservation Science, University of Ghana, Ghana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4773-5632
Mary E AshinyoInstitutional Care Division, Ghana Health Service Headquarters, Accra, Ghana.
Loveland FiagbeDepartment of Marketing and Supply Chain Management, University of Cape Coast, Ghana.
Serene AkpanyaDepartment of Health Administration, Hohoe Municipal Hospital, Hohoe, Ghana, Ghana.
Samuel K AkoriyeaInstitutional Care Division, Ghana Health Service Headquarters, Accra, Ghana.
S Dajan DubikDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, School of Allied Health Sciences, University for Development Studies, Tamale, Ghana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9833-2676

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFood handlers' hands serve as a vehicle for potential foodborne pathogenic contamination which constitutes a public health risk. In Ghana, there are always constant reports of outbreaks of foodborne diseases in schools. However, determinants of hand hygiene practice among educational institutions food handlers are little known. The study, therefore, aimed to assess the determinants of hand hygiene practice at critical times among educational institutions' food handlers in the Sagnarigu Municipality of Ghana.

methodsThis was a cross-sectional survey among educational institutions food handlers in the Sagnarigu Municipality. Two hundred and six food handlers were selected through convenience sampling in the educational institutions. At the same time, structured questions that were developed from previous studies were used to assess food handlers' hand hygiene practice at critical times. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, bivariate and multivariate logistic regression models. All variables with their respective confidence intervals (95%) and adjusted odds ratios were declared significant at

resultsHand hygiene practice at critical times among the food handlers were relatively good at a rating of 66.0% (95% CI: 59.1, 72.5%). Good hand hygiene practice at critical times was less likely among food handlers with no food safety training (AOR 0.04; 95% CI: 0.00, 0.41) and food handlers who had insufficient knowledge of hand hygiene (AOR 0.06; 95% CI 0.01, 0.25). Good hygiene practice at critical times was 99% lower in food handlers with a negative attitude as compared to food handlers with positive attitudes towards hand hygiene at critical times (AOR 0.01; 95% CI 0.00, 0.07). Only 17.0% of the food handlers demonstrated proper handwashing techniques, whereas a good number (85.4%) of the food handlers did not wash their hands after touching money.

conclusionGood hand hygiene practice at critical times was relatively good. Food safety training, knowledge of hand hygiene and attitudes towards hand hygiene were independent predictors of hand hygiene practice at critical times. Concerned stakeholders and organizations should focus on WASH interventions that seek to improve educational institutions food handlers' knowledge and attitudes towards hand hygiene, coupled with training on food safety.

Indexed as

educational institutionsFood handlingfood safetyGhanahand hygiene

Identifiers

PMID33088180
PMCPMC7545788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.