Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33088161›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2020

Qin-Fen Chen, Xiao-Dong Zhou, Dan-Hong Fang, En-Guang Zhang, Chun-Jing Lin, Xiao-Zhen Feng, Na Wang, Jian-Sheng Wu, Dan Wang, Wei-Hong Lin

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Sex-Specific Associations ofThe world journal of men's health · 2026
    Article
  2. Beyond the Stomach: Exploring the Role ofExpert reviews in molecular medicine · 2026
    Review
  3. EClinicalMedicine · 2025
    Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Gastroenterology and hepatology from bed to bench · 2025
    Article
  8. Relationship betweenWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Qin-Fen ChenDepartment of Physical Examination Medical Care Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325000, Zhejiang Province, China.
Xiao-Dong ZhouDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Diseases of Wenzhou, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325000, Zhejiang Province, China.
Dan-Hong FangDepartment of Physical Examination Medical Care Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325000, Zhejiang Province, China.
En-Guang ZhangDepartment of Physical Examination Medical Care Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325000, Zhejiang Province, China.
Chun-Jing LinDepartment of Physical Examination Medical Care Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325000, Zhejiang Province, China.
Xiao-Zhen FengDepartment of Physical Examination Medical Care Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325000, Zhejiang Province, China.
Na WangDepartment of Physical Examination Medical Care Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325000, Zhejiang Province, China.
Jian-Sheng WuDepartment of Physical Examination Medical Care Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325000, Zhejiang Province, China.
Dan WangDepartment of Physical Examination Medical Care Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325000, Zhejiang Province, China.
Wei-Hong LinDepartment of Physical Examination Medical Care Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325000, Zhejiang Province, China. linweihong@wmu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe significance of

aimTo investigate whether

methodsThis retrospective cross-sectional study included 6018 health-check individuals. The relevant data for physical examination, laboratory testing,

resultsOverall, 1012 subjects (16.8%) were diagnosed with colorectal adenomas, of whom 143 (2.4%) had advanced adenomas. Among the enrolled patients, the prevalence of

conclusion

Indexed as

AdenomaColorectal NeoplasmsGastritis, AtrophicHelicobacter InfectionsHelicobacter pyloriCross-Sectional StudiesHumansRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsAdenomasAtrophyColorectalGastritisHealth-checkHelicobacter pylori

Identifiers

PMID33088161
PMCPMC7545385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.