Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33088158›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2020

Short- and long-term outcomes associated with enhanced recovery after surgery protocol

Yu-Long Tian, Shou-Gen Cao, Xiao-Dong Liu, Ze-Qun Li, Gan Liu, Xing-Qi Zhang, Yu-Qi Sun, Xin Zhou, Dao-Sheng Wang, Yan-Bing Zhou

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yu-Long TianDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266003, Shandong Province, China.
Shou-Gen CaoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266003, Shandong Province, China.
Xiao-Dong LiuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266003, Shandong Province, China.
Ze-Qun LiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266003, Shandong Province, China.
Gan LiuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266003, Shandong Province, China.
Xing-Qi ZhangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266003, Shandong Province, China.
Yu-Qi SunDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266003, Shandong Province, China.
Xin ZhouDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266003, Shandong Province, China.
Dao-Sheng WangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266003, Shandong Province, China.
Yan-Bing ZhouDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266003, Shandong Province, China. zhou_yb2008@126.com.
Qingdao University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAt present, the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol is widely implemented in the field of gastric surgery. However, the effect of the ERAS protocol on the long-term prognosis of gastric cancer has not been reported.

aimTo compare the effects of ERAS and conventional protocols on short-term outcomes and long-term prognosis after laparoscopic gastrectomy.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed the data of 1026 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy between 2012 and 2015. The patients were divided into either an ERAS group or a conventional group. The groups were matched in a 1:1 ratio using propensity scores based on covariates that affect cancer survival. The primary outcomes were the 5-year overall and cancer-specific survival rates. The secondary outcomes were the postoperative short-term outcomes and inflammatory indexes.

resultsThe patient demographics and baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups after matching. Compared to the conventional group, the ERAS group had a significantly shorter postoperative hospital day (7.09 d

conclusionAdherence to the ERAS protocol improves both the short-term outcomes and the 5-year overall survival and cancer-specific survival of patients after laparoscopic gastrectomy.

Indexed as

Enhanced Recovery After SurgeryLaparoscopyStomach NeoplasmsGastrectomyHumansLength of StayPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeConventional managementEnhanced recovery after surgeryLaparoscopic gastrectomyShort-term outcomesSurvival

Identifiers

PMID33088158
PMCPMC7545391
OpenAlexW3088747869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.