Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33087840›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Proteomic analysis of Drosophila CLOCK complexes identifies rhythmic interactions with SAGA and Tip60 complex component NIPPED-A.

Guruswamy Mahesh, Gustavo B S Rivas, Courtney Caster, Evan B Ost, Ravi Amunugama, Richard Jones, David L Allen, Paul E Hardin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Post-Translational Modifications in Animal Circadian Clocks.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Guruswamy MaheshDepartment of Biology and Center for Biological Clocks Research, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA.
Gustavo B S RivasDepartment of Biology and Center for Biological Clocks Research, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA.
Courtney CasterDepartment of Biology and Center for Biological Clocks Research, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA.
Evan B OstDepartment of Biology and Center for Biological Clocks Research, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA.
Ravi AmunugamaMS Bioworks, LLC, Ann Arbor, MI, 48108, USA.
Richard JonesMS Bioworks, LLC, Ann Arbor, MI, 48108, USA.
David L AllenMS Bioworks, LLC, Ann Arbor, MI, 48108, USA.
Paul E HardinDepartment of Biology and Center for Biological Clocks Research, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA. phardin@bio.tamu.edu.
Texas A&M University · USBioWorks (United States) · US

Funding

Regulation of Circadian TranscriptionR01NS052854 · NINDS · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY · PI HARDIN, PAUL E · 2006 to 2014
$2.7M
NIH HHS NS 052854NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS052854
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Circadian clocks keep time via ~ 24 h transcriptional feedback loops. In Drosophila, CLOCK-CYCLE (CLK-CYC) activators and PERIOD-TIMELESS (PER-TIM) repressors are feedback loop components whose transcriptional status varies over a circadian cycle. Although changes in the state of activators and repressors has been characterized, how their status is translated to transcriptional activity is not understood. We used mass spectrometry to identify proteins that interact with GFP-tagged CLK (GFP-CLK) in fly heads at different times of day. Many expected and novel interacting proteins were detected, of which several interacted rhythmically and were potential regulators of protein levels, activity or transcriptional output. Genes encoding these proteins were tested to determine if they altered circadian behavior via RNAi knockdown in clock cells. The NIPPED-A protein, a scaffold for the SAGA and Tip60 histone modifying complexes, interacts with GFP-CLK as transcription is activated, and reducing Nipped-A expression lengthens circadian period. RNAi analysis of other SAGA complex components shows that the SAGA histone deubiquitination (DUB) module lengthened period similarly to Nipped-A RNAi knockdown and weakened rhythmicity, whereas reducing Tip60 HAT expression drastically weakened rhythmicity. These results suggest that CLK-CYC binds NIPPED-A early in the day to promote transcription through SAGA DUB and Tip60 HAT activity.

Indexed as

ProteomicsAnimalsCircadian ClocksCircadian RhythmCLOCK ProteinsDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsGene ExpressionHistone AcetyltransferasesProtein BindingRNA InterferenceTranscription FactorsTranscription, GeneticCLOCK ProteinsDrosophila ProteinsHistone AcetyltransferasesNIPPED-A protein, DrosophilaTip60 protein, DrosophilaTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID33087840
PMCPMC7578830
OpenAlexW3094508105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.