ArticleScientific reports2020
Genassemblage 2.0 software facilitates conservation of genetic variation of captively propagated species.
Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Management of Genetic Variation in the Gamete Bank of the Endangered Lake MinnowAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In conservation of captively propagated species, conserving genetic diversity is important. Here, we present an example of the use of Genassemblage 2.0 software in conserving the genetic variation of the lake minnow (Eupallasella percnurus). This fish has low genetic variation and is at risk of extinction in the western edge of its range, which includes Poland. Fish from one Polish population were captured (23 males, 25 females). Fin clips were taken, and DNA was extracted. Polymorphic microsatellites (13) were used to prepare genetic profiles, assess genetic variation in the fish and estimate genetic diversity in their progeny. Alleles were scored using an automatic capillary sequencer. The four and eight best variants of spawning pairs, and the optimal sets for group volitional breeding (four males, four females; eight males, eight females) were identified using Genassemblage 2.0. In the sets of 8 and 16 fish for group breeding, the mean heterozygosity, the number of alleles, and the share of "weak" heterozygotes (0.493, 24, 0.239 and 0.479, 23, 0.257, respectively) were better than the mean values for the progeny of all potential breeding pairs. For group volitional breeding, one set of four males and four females, and numerous sets of eight males and eight females would enable transmission of all 33 alleles identified in the potential broodstock and an expected progeny heterozygosity of 0.441 and 0.414, respectively. These expected heterozygosity values are higher than those in the broodstock. For practical purposes, the larger sets would be preferable for avoiding a future inbreeding and genetic drift.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.