ArticleScientific reports2020
Individualized fluid administration for critically ill patients with sepsis with an interpretable dynamic treatment regimen model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- A prediction model for 30-day mortality of sepsis patients based on intravenous fluids and electrolytes.Medicine · 2022Trial
- Liberal Versus Restrictive Fluid Therapy in the Early Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2026Review
- Individualized treatment rule for early steroid use in hospitalized patients with community acquired pneumonia: a cohort study.Pneumonia (Nathan Qld.) · 2025Article
- Optimal fluid resuscitation targets in septic patients with acutely decompensated heart failure.BMC medicine · 2024Article
- Federated Offline Reinforcement Learning.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2024Article
- Causal inference using observational intensive care unit data: a scoping review and recommendations for future practice.NPJ digital medicine · 2023Article
- Precision fluid and vasoactive drug therapy for critically ill patients.Pharmacotherapy · 2023Review
- Fluids and Early Vasopressors in the Management of Septic Shock: Do We Have the Right Answers Yet?Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures) · 2023Review
- Fluid Therapy from Friend to Foe.Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures) · 2023Article
- A value-based deep reinforcement learning model with human expertise in optimal treatment of sepsis.NPJ digital medicine · 2023Article
- Dynamic interaction nursing intervention on functional rehabilitation and self-care ability of patients after aneurysm surgery.World journal of clinical cases · 2022Article
- Establishment and Implementation of Potential Fluid Therapy Balance Strategies for ICU Sepsis Patients Based on Reinforcement Learning.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- Individualized resuscitation strategy for septic shock formalized by finite mixture modeling and dynamic treatment regimen.Critical care (London, England) · 2021Article
- A Simple Weaning Model Based on Interpretable Machine Learning Algorithm for Patients With Sepsis: A Research of MIMIC-IV and eICU Databases.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fluid strategy is the key to the successful management of patients with sepsis. However, previous studies failed to consider individualized treatment strategy, and clinical trials typically included patients with sepsis as a homogeneous study population. We aimed to develop sequential decision rules for managing fluid intake in patients with sepsis by using the dynamic treatment regimen (DTR) model. A retrospective analysis of the eICU Collaborative Research Database comprising highly granular data collected from 335 units at 208 hospitals was performed. The DTR model used a backward induction algorithm to estimate the sequence of optimal rules. 22,868 patients who had sepsis according to the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) IV diagnosis group were included. Optimal fluid management (liberal [> 40 ml/kg/d] versus restricted [< 40 ml/kg/d]) strategy were developed on the Day 1, 3 and 5 after ICU admission according to current states and treatment history. Important determinants of optimal fluid strategy included mean blood pressure, heart rate, previous urine output, previous fluid strategy, ICU type and mechanical ventilation. Different functional forms such as quadratic function and interaction terms were used at different stages. The proportion of subjects being inappropriately treated with liberal fluid strategy (i.e. those actually received liberal fluid strategy, but could have longer survival time if they received restricted fluid strategy) increased from day 1 to 5 (19.3% to 29.5%). The survival time could be significantly prolonged had all patients been treated with optimal fluid strategy (5.7 [2.0, 5.9] vs. 4.1 [2.0, 5.0] days; p < 0.001). With a large volume of sepsis data, we successfully computed out a sequence of dynamic fluid management strategy for sepsis patients over the first 5 days after ICU admission. The decision rules generated by the DTR model predicted a longer survival time compared to the true observed strategy, which sheds light for improving patient outcome with the aim from computer-assisted algorithm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.