Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33087759›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Chasing coevolutionary signals in intrinsically disordered proteins complexes.

Javier A Iserte, Tamas Lazar, Silvio C E Tosatto, Peter Tompa, Cristina Marino-Buslje

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Javier A IserteFundación Instituto Leloir, Patricias Argentinas 435, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Tamas LazarVIB-VUB Center for Structural Biology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1050, Brussels, Belgium.
Silvio C E TosattoDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Padova, 35121, Padova, Italy.
Peter TompaVIB-VUB Center for Structural Biology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1050, Brussels, Belgium.
Cristina Marino-BusljeFundación Instituto Leloir, Patricias Argentinas 435, Buenos Aires, Argentina. cmb@leloir.org.ar.

Funding

Marie Curie 778247
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intrinsically disordered proteins/regions (IDPs/IDRs) are crucial components of the cell, they are highly abundant and participate ubiquitously in a wide range of biological functions, such as regulatory processes and cell signaling. Many of their important functions rely on protein interactions, by which they trigger or modulate different pathways. Sequence covariation, a powerful tool for protein contact prediction, has been applied successfully to predict protein structure and to identify protein-protein interactions mostly of globular proteins. IDPs/IDRs also mediate a plethora of protein-protein interactions, highlighting the importance of addressing sequence covariation-based inter-protein contact prediction of this class of proteins. Despite their importance, a systematic approach to analyze the covariation phenomena of intrinsically disordered proteins and their complexes is still missing. Here we carry out a comprehensive critical assessment of coevolution-based contact prediction in IDP/IDR complexes and detail the challenges and possible limitations that emerge from their analysis. We found that the coevolutionary signal is faint in most of the complexes of disordered proteins but positively correlates with the interface size and binding affinity between partners. In addition, we discuss the state-of-art methodology by biological interpretation of the results, formulate evaluation guidelines and suggest future directions of development to the field.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceBiochemical PhenomenaIntrinsically Disordered ProteinsProtein BindingProtein ConformationProtein FoldingProtein Interaction Domains and MotifsSignal TransductionIntrinsically Disordered Proteins

Identifiers

PMID33087759
PMCPMC7578644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.