Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33087752›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Newly established gastrointestinal cancer cell lines retain the genomic and immunophenotypic landscape of their parental cancers.

Daniela Hirsch, Steffen Seyfried, Tobias Staib, David Fiedler, Christian Sauer, Thomas Ried, Stephanie Witt, Felix Rueckert, Timo Gaiser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Daniela HirschInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany.
Steffen SeyfriedDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Tobias StaibDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
David FiedlerInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany.
Christian SauerInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany.
Thomas RiedSection of Cancer Genomics, Genetics Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Stephanie WittMolecular Genetic Laboratory and Biobank, Department of Genetic Epidemiology in Psychiatry, Central Institute for Mental Health (CIMH), Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Felix RueckertDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Timo GaiserInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany. timo.gaiser@umm.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human cancer cell lines are frequently used as model systems to study molecular mechanisms and genetic changes in cancer. However, the model is repeatedly criticized for its lack of proximity to original patient tumors. Therefore, understanding to what extent cell lines cultured under artificial conditions reflect the phenotypic and genomic profiles of their corresponding parental tumors is crucial when analyzing their biological properties. To directly compare molecular alterations between patient tumors and derived cell lines, we have established new cancer cell lines from four patients with gastrointestinal tumors. Tumor entities comprised esophageal cancer, colon cancer, rectal cancer and pancreatic cancer. Phenotype and genotype of both patient tumors and derived low-passage cell lines were characterized by immunohistochemistry (22 different antibodies), array-based comparative genomic hybridization and targeted next generation sequencing (48-gene panel). The immunophenotype was highly consistent between patient tumors and derived cell lines; the expression of most markers in cell lines was concordant with the respective parental tumor and characteristic for the respective tumor entities in general. The chromosomal aberration patterns of the parental tumors were largely maintained in the cell lines and the distribution of gains and losses was typical for the respective cancer entity, despite a few distinct differences. Cancer gene mutations (e.g., KRAS, TP53) and microsatellite status were also preserved in the respective cell line derivates. In conclusion, the four examined newly established cell lines exhibited a phenotype and genotype closely recapitulating their parental tumor. Hence, newly established cancer cell lines may be useful models for further pharmacogenomic studies.

Indexed as

Cell Line, TumorCell SeparationChromosome AberrationsComparative Genomic HybridizationGastrointestinal NeoplasmsGenotypeHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansImmunohistochemistryMicrosatellite RepeatsMutationPhenotypeProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Tumor Suppressor Protein p53KRAS protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)TP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID33087752
PMCPMC7578805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.