ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2020
Structure of Population Activity in Primary Motor Cortex for Single Finger Flexion and Extension.
Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Focal Task-Specific Dystonia Beyond M1: Network Adaptations and a Causal-Architecture Taxonomy of Dystonia.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- Arm dominance is an emergent effect of practice executing complex trajectory shapes required by tools and objects.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Brain activity related to individuated finger movement demonstrated by simultaneous motion capture and fMRI.PloS one · 2026Article
- Mental graphs structure the storage and retrieval of visuomotor associations.Nature human behaviour · 2025Article
- TMS-Based Neurofeedback Training of Mental Finger Individuation Induces Neuroplastic Changes in the Sensorimotor System.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Article
- Pseudo-linear summation explains neural geometry of multi-finger movements in human premotor cortex.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Evolution, biomechanics, and neurobiology converge to explain selective finger motor control.Physiological reviews · 2024Review
- Betz cells of the primary motor cortex.The Journal of comparative neurology · 2024Review
- Scalable, modular continuous wave functional near-infrared spectroscopy system (Spotlight).Journal of biomedical optics · 2023Article
- Article
- Mapping the Integration of Sensory Information across Fingers in Human Sensorimotor Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022Article
- Constructing neural network models from brain data reveals representational transformations linked to adaptive behavior.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Motor planning brings human primary somatosensory cortex into action-specific preparatory states.eLife · 2022Article
- Visually and Tactually Guided Grasps Lead to Different Neuronal Activity in Non-human Primates.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
How is the primary motor cortex (M1) organized to control fine finger movements? We investigated the population activity in M1 for single finger flexion and extension, using 7T functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in female and male human participants and compared these results to the neural spiking patterns recorded in two male monkeys performing the identical task. fMRI activity patterns were distinct for movements of different fingers, but were quite similar for flexion and extension of the same finger. In contrast, spiking patterns in monkeys were quite distinct for both fingers and directions, which is similar to what was found for muscular activity patterns. The discrepancy between fMRI and electrophysiological measurements can be explained by two (non-mutually exclusive) characteristics of the organization of finger flexion and extension movements. Given that fMRI reflects predominantly input and recurrent activity, the results can be explained by an architecture in which neural populations that control flexion or extension of the same finger produce distinct outputs, but interact tightly with each other and receive similar inputs. Additionally, neurons tuned to different movement directions for the same finger (or combination of fingers) may cluster closely together, while neurons that control different finger combinations may be more spatially separated. When measuring this organization with fMRI at a coarse spatial scale, the activity patterns for flexion and extension of the same finger would appear very similar. Overall, we suggest that the discrepancy between fMRI and electrophysiological measurements provides new insights into the general organization of fine finger movements in M1.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.