Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33087336›Full record

ReviewBMJ health & care informatics2020

Students' perceptions on their use of an EHR: pilot questionnaire study.

Beverley S Ellis, Susan Quayle, Ian Bailey, Svetlana Tishkovskaya, Joseph Spencer, Robin Richardson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ health & care informatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Nursing Informatics' Contribution to One Health.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Beverley S EllisFaculty of Health and Social Care, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, Lancashire, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0938-1172
Susan QuayleSchool of Nursing, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, Lancashire, UK SQuayle2@uclan.ac.uk.
Ian BaileyEmis Health, Leeds, UK.
Svetlana TishkovskayaAcademic Research Support Team, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, Lancashire, UK.
Joseph SpencerAcademic Research Support Team, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, Lancashire, UK.
Robin RichardsonFaculty of Health and Social Care, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, Lancashire, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMany clinical education programmes have not incorporated the use of the electronic health record (EHR) into their curriculum. It is important to incorporate technologies that will be used in real-world settings to better prepare students for clinical practice.

objectivesTo undertake a review of literature to identify a training evaluation framework; to conduct a self-completion survey, pretraining and post-training, to determine students' perceptions on the benefit of using EHR training system.

settingNursing School, University, North West England, UK; University Ethic Committee Approval Received.

participantsRegistered nurses undertaking a validated return to practice course; 24 participants for the first cohort who completed pretraining questionnaire and 23 for the second post-training cohort.

resultsThe statistical results show that the students perceived that the training improved their capability in employing digital systems with statistically significant difference in the assessed preproficiency and post proficiency in the use of digital clinical systems (premedians and post medians are 2 and 5 on 10-point Likert scale, p=0.041). There was also an indication of an improvement in the knowledge of EHR systems although not statistically significant. Most students perceived it increased their knowledge on digital systems.

conclusionStudents perceived an increase in proficiency with the EHR. There was evidence of improvement in confidence in the use of the EHR, but this confidence would be enhanced by additional use of the system. Some desire to increase confidence further and to develop knowledge of digital systems was expressed.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsNursesStudentsCurriculumHumansNursing Evaluation ResearchPerceptionSurveys and QuestionnairesBMJ Health Informaticsnursing

Identifiers

PMID33087336
PMCPMC7580040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.