Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33087331›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2021

Altered Gemcitabine and Nab-paclitaxel Scheduling Improves Therapeutic Efficacy Compared with Standard Concurrent Treatment in Preclinical Models of Pancreatic Cancer.

Adam R Wolfe, Ryan Robb, Ahmad Hegazi, Laith Abushahin, Linlin Yang, Duan-Liang Shyu, Jose G Trevino, Zobeida Cruz-Monserrate, John R Jacob, Kamalakannan Palanichamy and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Adam R Wolfe *Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Arthur G. James Comprehensive Cancer Center and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, Columbus, Ohio.ORCID 0000-0002-0123-7371
Ryan Robb *Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Arthur G. James Comprehensive Cancer Center and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, Columbus, Ohio.
Ahmad HegaziDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Arthur G. James Comprehensive Cancer Center and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, Columbus, Ohio.
Laith AbushahinDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210.
Linlin YangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Arthur G. James Comprehensive Cancer Center and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, Columbus, Ohio.
Duan-Liang ShyuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Arthur G. James Comprehensive Cancer Center and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, Columbus, Ohio.
Jose G TrevinoDepartment of Surgery, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida.
Zobeida Cruz-MonserrateDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.
John R JacobDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Arthur G. James Comprehensive Cancer Center and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, Columbus, Ohio.
Kamalakannan PalanichamyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Arthur G. James Comprehensive Cancer Center and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, Columbus, Ohio.
Arnab ChakravartiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Arthur G. James Comprehensive Cancer Center and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, Columbus, Ohio.
Terence M WilliamsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Arthur G. James Comprehensive Cancer Center and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, Columbus, Ohio. Terence.Williams@osumc.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-1020-0845
The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center – Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute · USThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center · USUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

Translational Therapeutics Research Program (TT)P30CA016058 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Jennifer A. Woyach · 1985 to 2026
$132.3M
Exploiting Caveolae-Dependent Albumin Endocytosis to Optimize Therapy in Pancreatic CancerR01CA198128 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI WILLIAMS, TERENCE MARQUES · 2016 to 2021
$2.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016058NCI NIH HHS R01 CA198128
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeConcurrent gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel treatment is one of the preferred chemotherapy regimens for metastatic and locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Previous studies demonstrate that caveolin-1 (Cav-1) expression is critical for nab-paclitaxel uptake into tumors and correlates with response. Gemcitabine increases nab-paclitaxel uptake by increasing Cav-1 expression. Thus, we hypothesized that pretreatment with gemcitabine would further enhance the sensitivity of PDAC to nab-paclitaxel by increasing Cav-1 expression and nab-paclitaxel uptake. EXPERIMENTAL

designWe investigated the sensitivity of different gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel treatment regimens in a panel of PDAC cell lines and orthotopic xenograft models. The sensitivity of different treatment regimens was compared with the standard concurrent treatment.

resultsPretreatment with gemcitabine before nab-paclitaxel increased Cav-1 and albumin uptake and significantly decreased proliferation and clonogenicity compared with concurrent treatment, which correlated with increased levels of apoptosis. Cav-1 silencing reduced the uptake of albumin, and therapeutic advantage was observed when cells were pretreated with gemcitabine prior to nab-paclitaxel. In addition, we observed that pretreatment with gemcitabine resulted in partial synchronization of cells in the G

conclusionsPretreatment with gemcitabine significantly increased nab-paclitaxel uptake and correlated with an increased treatment efficacy and survival benefit in preclinical models, compared with standard concurrent treatment. These results justify preclinical and clinical testing of this altered scheduling combination.

Indexed as

AlbuminsAnimalsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalCaveolin 1Cell CycleCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationDeoxycytidineDrug Administration ScheduleGemcitabineGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMaleMiceMice, Inbred NOD130-nm albumin-bound paclitaxelAlbuminsCaveolin 1DeoxycytidineGemcitabinePaclitaxel

Identifiers

PMID33087331
PMCPMC7855515
OpenAlexW3093546632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.