Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33087313›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of ophthalmology2022

Risk of non-infectious uveitis or myasthenia gravis in patients on checkpoint inhibitors in a large healthcare claims database.

Tian Xia, Alexander J Brucker, Brendan McGeehan, Brian L VanderBeek

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Rates of Drug-Induced Uveitis: A Review by Medication Class.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026
    Review
  6. Neuro-ophthalmic complications of modern anti-cancer drugs.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tian XiaScheie Eye Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9773-4478
Alexander J BruckerScheie Eye Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Brendan McGeehanScheie Eye Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Brian L VanderBeekScheie Eye Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA Brian.VanderBeek@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-4953-118X
Penn Presbyterian Medical Center · US

Funding

Scientific TransparencyP30EY001583 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI CLAIRE H MITCHELL · 1985 to 2026
$19.5M
Patient Centered Care for Diabetic Macular EdemaK23EY025729 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI VANDERBEEK, BRIAN L. · 2015 to 2019
$1.1M
NEI NIH HHS K23 EY025729NEI NIH HHS P30 EY001583
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo determine if checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) confer an increased risk of non-infectious uveitis or myasthenia gravis (MG) compared to patients on non-checkpoint inhibitor (N-CPI) chemotherapy.

methodsA retrospective cohort study was performed comparing patients in a large commercial and Medicare advantage database exposed to CPI compared to N-CPI. All patients who initiated a CPI (ipilimumab, pembrolizumab, nivolumab, atezolizumab, avelumab, cemiplimab and durvalumab) were eligible. Date of earliest CPI in the exposure group and N-CPI chemotherapy in the comparator group was considered the index date. Exclusion occurred in both cohorts for any history of uveitis or MG diagnosis and having <1 year in the insurance plan prior to the index date, and <6 months in plan following the index date. Every exposed patient was matched up to 1:10 based on demographics and index year to patients on N-CPI chemotherapy. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression modelling was performed.

resultsFor evaluation of incidence of non-infectious uveitis, 26 (0.3%) of 8678 patients on CPI and 123 (0.2%) of 76 153 N-CPI comparators were found to have non-infectious uveitis. After multivariate analysis, CPIs showed an increased hazard for uveitis compared to N-CPI (HR=2.09; 95% CI 1.36 to 3.22, p=0.001). For the MG analysis, 11 (0.1%) of 9210 patients developed MG in the CPI group and 36 (0.04%) of 80 620 comparators. The CPI cohort had a higher hazard of developing MG (HR=2.60; 95% CI 1.34 to 5.07, p=0.005) compared to controls in multivariate analysis.

conclusionsExposure to CPI confers a higher risk for non-infectious uveitis and MG compared to N-CPI chemotherapy.

Indexed as

Myasthenia GravisUveitisAgedDelivery of Health CareHumansMedicareRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesDrugsEpidemiologyInflammation

Identifiers

PMID33087313
PMCPMC8173351
OpenAlexW3093750334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.