Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33087211›Full record

SynthesisEuropean psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists2020

Understanding the experience of initiating community-based group physical activity by people with serious mental illness: A systematic review using a meta-ethnographic approach.

Helen Quirk, Emma Hock, Deborah Harrop, Helen Crank, Emily Peckham, Gemma Traviss-Turner, Katarzyna Machaczek, Brendon Stubbs, Michelle Horspool, Scott Weich and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Helen QuirkSchool of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Regent Court, Sheffield, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2716-4681
Emma HockSchool of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Regent Court, Sheffield, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8617-8875
Deborah HarropHealth and Social Care Research, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Helen CrankHealth and Social Care Research, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Emily PeckhamDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9377-1968
Gemma Traviss-TurnerLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1770-6216
Katarzyna MachaczekAdvanced Wellbeing Research Centre, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Brendon StubbsDepartment of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Michelle HorspoolSheffield Health & Social Care NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3069-6091
Scott WeichSchool of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Regent Court, Sheffield, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7552-7697
Robert CopelandAdvanced Wellbeing Research Centre, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4147-5876

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople living with serious mental illness (SMI) experience debilitating symptoms that worsen their physical health and quality of life. Regular physical activity (PA) may bring symptomatic improvements and enhance wellbeing. When undertaken in community-based group settings, PA may yield additional benefits such as reduced isolation. Initiating PA can be difficult for people with SMI, so PA engagement is commonly low. Designing acceptable and effective PA programs requires a better understanding of the lived experiences of PA initiation among people with SMI.

methodsThis systematic review of qualitative studies used the meta-ethnography approach by Noblit and Hare (1988). Electronic databases were searched from inception to November 2017. Eligible studies used qualitative methodology; involved adults (≥18 years) with schizophrenia, bipolar affective disorder, major depressive disorder, or psychosis; reported community-based group PA; and captured the experience of PA initiation, including key features of social support. Study selection and quality assessment were performed by four reviewers.

resultsSixteen studies were included in the review. We identified a "journey" that depicted a long sequence of phases involved in initiating PA. The journey demonstrated the thought processes, expectations, barriers, and support needs of people with SMI. In particular, social support from a trusted source played an important role in getting people to the activity, both physically and emotionally. DISCUSSION: The journey illustrated that initiation of PA for people with SMI is a long complex transition. This complex process needs to be understood before ongoing participation in PA can be addressed. Registration-The review was registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) on 22/03/2017 (registration number CRD42017059948).

Indexed as

Social SupportAdultBipolar DisorderExerciseHumansMajor Depressive DisorderMental DisordersPsychotic DisordersQualitative ResearchQuality of LifeSchizophreniaSeverity of Illness IndexAdultsinitiationmeta-ethnographyphysical activityserious mental illness

Identifiers

PMID33087211
PMCPMC7681136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.