ArticleBMC medical genomics2020
Considerations for feature selection using gene pairs and applications in large-scale dataset integration, novel oncogene discovery, and interpretable cancer screening.
Article in BMC medical genomics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Applications of gene pair methods in clinical research: advancing precision medicine.Molecular biomedicine · 2025Review
- Systematic analysis of the transcriptional landscape of melanoma reveals drug-target expression plasticity.Briefings in functional genomics · 2025Article
- Excavation of gene markers associated with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma based on interrelationships of gene expression.IET systems biology · 2024Article
- RGIE: A Gene Selection Method Related to Radiotherapy Resistance in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Current radiopharmaceuticals · 2024Article
- Transcriptomes reveal microRNAs and mRNAs in different photoperiods influencing cashmere growth in goat.PloS one · 2023Article
- Multimetric feature selection for analyzing multicategory outcomes of colorectal cancer: random forest and multinomial logistic regression models.Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology · 2022Article
- Elevated expression of NFE2L3 promotes the development of gastric cancer through epithelial-mesenchymal transformation.Bioengineered · 2021Article
- Transcriptome-Wide Analysis of Human Liver Reveals Age-Related Differences in the Expression of Select Functional Gene Clusters and Evidence for a PPP1R10-Governed 'Aging Cascade'.Pharmaceutics · 2021Article
- EARN: an ensemble machine learning algorithm to predict driver genes in metastatic breast cancer.BMC medical genomics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdvancements in transcriptomic profiling have led to the emergence of new challenges regarding data integration and interpretability. Variability between measurement platforms makes it difficult to compare between cohorts, and large numbers of gene features have encouraged the use black box methods that are not easily translated into biologically and clinically meaningful findings. We propose that gene rankings and algorithms that rely on relative expression within gene pairs can address such obstacles.
methodsWe implemented an innovative process to evaluate the performance of five feature selection methods on simulated gene-pair data. Along with TSP, we consider other methods that retain more information in their score calculations, including the magnitude of gene expression change as well as within-class variation. Tree-based rule extraction was also applied to serum microRNA (miRNA) pairs in order to devise a noninvasive screening tool for pancreatic and ovarian cancer.
resultsGene pair data were simulated using different types of signal and noise. Pairs were filtered using feature selection approaches, including top-scoring pairs (TSP), absolute differences between gene ranks, and Fisher scores. Methods that retain more information, such as the magnitude of expression change and within-class variance, yielded higher classification accuracy using a random forest model. We then demonstrate two powerful applications of gene pairs by first performing large-scale integration of 52 breast cancer datasets consisting of 10,350 patients. Not only did we confirm known oncogenes, but we also propose novel tumorigenic genes, such as BSDC1 and U2AF1, that could distinguish between tumor subtypes. Finally, circulating miRNA pairs were filtered and salient rules were extracted to build simplified tree ensemble learners (STELs) for four types of cancer. These accessible clinical frameworks detected pancreatic and ovarian cancer with 84.8 and 93.6% accuracy, respectively.
conclusionRank-based gene pair classification benefits from careful feature selection methods that preserve maximal information. Gene pairs enable dataset integration for greater statistical power and discovery of robust biomarkers as well as facilitate construction of user-friendly clinical screening tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.