Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33087056›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2020

Influence of inoculated gut bacteria on the development of Bactrocera dorsalis and on its susceptibility to the entomopathogenic fungus, Metarhizium anisopliae.

Joseph Gichuhi, Fathiya Khamis, Johnnie Van den Berg, Samira Mohamed, Sunday Ekesi, Jeremy K Herren

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Insects · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Effect of host shift on the gut microbes ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Joseph GichuhiInternational Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (icipe), Nairobi, Kenya.
Fathiya KhamisInternational Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (icipe), Nairobi, Kenya.
Johnnie Van den BergUnit for Environmental Sciences and Management, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa.
Samira MohamedInternational Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (icipe), Nairobi, Kenya.
Sunday EkesiInternational Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (icipe), Nairobi, Kenya.
Jeremy K HerrenInternational Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (icipe), Nairobi, Kenya. jherren@icipe.org.ORCID 0000-0003-2239-7275
International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology · KENorth-West University · ZA

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 107372
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSymbiotic interactions between insects and bacteria have been associated with a vast variety of physiological, ecological and evolutionary consequences for the host. A wide range of bacterial communities have been found in association with the oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) (Diptera: Tephritidae), an important pest of cultivated fruit in most regions of the world. We evaluated the diversity of gut bacteria in B. dorsalis specimens from several populations in Kenya and investigated the roles of individual bacterial isolates in the development of axenic (germ-free) B. dorsalis fly lines and their responses to the entomopathogenic fungus, Metarhizium anisopliae.

resultsWe sequenced 16S rRNA to evaluate microbiomes and coupled this with bacterial culturing. Bacterial isolates were mono-associated with axenic B. dorsalis embryos. The shortest embryonic development period was recorded in flies with an intact gut microbiome while the longest period was recorded in axenic fly lines. Similarly, larval development was shortest in flies with an intact gut microbiome, in addition to flies inoculated with Providencia alcalifaciens. Adult B. dorsalis flies emerging from embryos that had been mono-associated with a strain of Lactococcus lactis had decreased survival when challenged with a standard dosage of M. anisopliae ICIPE69 conidia. However, there were no differences in survival between the germ-free lines and flies with an intact microbiome.

conclusionsThese findings will contribute to the selection of probiotics used in artificial diets for B. dorsalis rearing and the development of improved integrated pest management strategies based on entomopathogenic fungi.

Indexed as

Pest Control, BiologicalAnimalsBacteriaGastrointestinal MicrobiomeKenyaLactococcus lactisMetarhiziumPhylogenyProvidenciaRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSymbiosisTephritidaeRNA, Ribosomal, 16SBactrocera dorsalisGut bacteriaLactococcus lactisMetarhizium anisopliae

Identifiers

PMID33087056
PMCPMC7579797
OpenAlexW3093943547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.