Trial reportBMC family practice2020
Improving knowledge, self-efficacy and collective efficacy regarding the Brazilian dietary guidelines in primary health care professionals: a community controlled trial.
Trial report in BMC family practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Professional training to implement the dietary guidelines for the Brazilian population in primary health care: development and content validity of a massive open online course.BMC primary care · 2025Article
- Translating the Brazilian Dietary Guidelines into clinical practice: innovative strategies for healthcare professionals.Archives of endocrinology and metabolism · 2025Review
- Application of the Food Guide for the Brazilian Population as a training instrument for intersectoral actions: perceptions of professionals in a Brazilian metropolis.Epidemiologia e servicos de saude : revista do Sistema Unico de Saude do Brasil · 2025Article
- Perceptions of Family Health Strategy doctors and nurses on the promotion of adequate and healthy eating practices in light of the Dietary Guidelines, Santa Bárbara d'Oeste, 2022: qualitative study.Epidemiologia e servicos de saude : revista do Sistema Unico de Saude do Brasil · 2025Article
- Review
- Do Primary Health Professionals in Brazil Have a Misperception about Food? The Role of Food Literacy as a Positive Predictor.Nutrients · 2024Article
- Trends in guideline implementation: an updated scoping review.Implementation science : IS · 2022Article
- Health Care Workers' Perceived Self-Efficacy to Manage COVID-19 Patients in Central Uganda: A Cross-Sectional Study.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2022Article
- Consumption of ultra-processed foods and nutritional profile in a health promotion service of primary care.Public health nutrition · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCapacity-building of health professionals regarding to nutrition is a strategy for qualifying public health work to promote healthy diets in primary health care (PHC) services.
objectiveTo evaluate the effect of an intervention based on Brazilian Dietary Guidelines (BDG) on the knowledge, self-efficacy (SE) and collective efficacy (CE) of interprofessional teams working in PHC.
methodsIt refers to a pre-post intervention study involving 24 health professionals divided into a control group (CG) and intervention (IG). The IG received a 16-h educational workshop on the BDG, guided by a validated protocol. Knowledge, SE and CE for using the BDG were assessed via a self-administered scale, ranging from 0 to 16 and 0 to 36 points, respectively; the scale was previously validated, completed before and after 2 months of the intervention. The effects of the intervention were estimated by paired t-test for intragroup comparisons over time.
resultsThe mean difference in the knowledge and SE scores of the IG pre- and post-intervention was 2.0 (CI 0.49-3.51) and 6.75 (CI 4.05-9.45) points, respectively. These results means the IG participants obtained 59 and 52.8% more points in knowledge and in SE in relation to CG, with significative difference (p = 0.007 and p < 0.00, respectively). There was no significant variation in the CE scores in both groups.
conclusionsConsidering the results presented and due to the originality of the study in question, the educational workshop was effective in increasing the knowledge and SE of professionals working in PHC in using the Dietary Guidelines in their work routines. These findings can assist other research in developing nutrition interventions with interprofessional teams.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.