Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33086550›Full record

ArticleCancers2020

Radiomic Immunophenotyping of GSEA-Assessed Immunophenotypes of Glioblastoma and Its Implications for Prognosis: A Feasibility Study.

Justin Bo-Kai Hsu, Gilbert Aaron Lee, Tzu-Hao Chang, Shiu-Wen Huang, Nguyen Quoc Khanh Le, Yung-Chieh Chen, Duen-Pang Kuo, Yi-Tien Li, Cheng-Yu Chen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Radiomics for precision medicine in glioblastoma.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Justin Bo-Kai HsuDepartment of Medical Research, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei 110, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-4563-2672
Gilbert Aaron LeeDepartment of Medical Research, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei 110, Taiwan.
Tzu-Hao ChangGraduate Institute of Biomedical Informatics, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-7011-3754
Shiu-Wen HuangDepartment of Medical Research, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei 110, Taiwan.
Nguyen Quoc Khanh LeProfessional Master Program in Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-4896-7926
Yung-Chieh ChenTranslational Imaging Research Center, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei 110, Taiwan.
Duen-Pang KuoTranslational Imaging Research Center, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei 110, Taiwan.
Yi-Tien LiTranslational Imaging Research Center, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei 110, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-3834-2615
Cheng-Yu ChenTranslational Imaging Research Center, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei 110, Taiwan.
Taipei Medical University Hospital · TWTaipei Medical University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Characterization of immunophenotypes in glioblastoma (GBM) is important for therapeutic stratification and helps predict treatment response and prognosis. Radiomics can be used to predict molecular subtypes and gene expression levels. However, whether radiomics aids immunophenotyping prediction is still unknown. In this study, to classify immunophenotypes in patients with GBM, we developed machine learning-based magnetic resonance (MR) radiomic models to evaluate the enrichment levels of four immune subsets: Cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs), activated dendritic cells, regulatory T cells (Tregs), and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs). Independent testing data and the leave-one-out cross-validation method were used to evaluate model effectiveness and model performance, respectively. We identified five immunophenotypes (G1 to G5) based on the enrichment level for the four immune subsets. G2 had the worst prognosis and comprised highly enriched MDSCs and lowly enriched CTLs. G3 had the best prognosis and comprised lowly enriched MDSCs and Tregs and highly enriched CTLs. The average accuracy of T1-weighted contrasted MR radiomics models of the enrichment level for the four immune subsets reached 79% and predicted G2, G3, and the "immune-cold" phenotype (G1) according to our radiomics models. Our radiomic immunophenotyping models feasibly characterize the immunophenotypes of GBM and can predict patient prognosis.

Indexed as

first-order statisticsglioblastomagray-level co-occurrence matrixgray-level run length matriximmunophenotypesradiogenomics

Identifiers

PMID33086550
PMCPMC7603270
OpenAlexW3093064592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.