Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33086521›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Development of a Minimally Invasive Screening Tool to Identify Obese Pediatric Population at Risk of Obstructive Sleep Apnea/Hypopnea Syndrome.

José Miguel Calderón, Julio Álvarez-Pitti, Irene Cuenca, Francisco Ponce, Pau Redon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Combined explainable deep learning model to predict pediatric sleep apnea from ECG and SpOMeasurement : journal of the International Measurement Confederation · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Paediatric sleep diagnostics in the 21st century: the era of "sleep-omics"?European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

José Miguel CalderónFundación Investigación Hospital Clínico (INCLIVA), Avda. Menedez Pelayo 4, 46010 Valencia, Spain.
Julio Álvarez-PittiPediatric Department, Consorcio Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, Avda. Tres Cruces s/n, 46014 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0452-7822
Irene CuencaFundación Investigación Hospital Clínico (INCLIVA), Avda. Menedez Pelayo 4, 46010 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0336-6468
Francisco PoncePediatric Department, Consorcio Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, Avda. Tres Cruces s/n, 46014 Valencia, Spain.
Pau RedonPediatric Department, Consorcio Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, Avda. Tres Cruces s/n, 46014 Valencia, Spain.
Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red · ESINCLIVA Health Research Institute · ESHospital General Universitario De Valencia · ES

Funding

Conselleria de Cultura, Educación y Ciencia, Generalitat Valenciana 2016/84
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome is a reduction of the airflow during sleep which not only produces a reduction in sleep quality but also has major health consequences. The prevalence in the obese pediatric population can surpass 50%, and polysomnography is the current gold standard method for its diagnosis. Unfortunately, it is expensive, disturbing and time-consuming for experienced professionals. The objective is to develop a patient-friendly screening tool for the obese pediatric population to identify those children at higher risk of suffering from this syndrome. Three supervised learning classifier algorithms (i.e., logistic regression, support vector machine and AdaBoost) common in the field of machine learning were trained and tested on two very different datasets where oxygen saturation raw signal was recorded. The first dataset was the Childhood Adenotonsillectomy Trial (CHAT) consisting of 453 individuals, with ages between 5 and 9 years old and one-third of the patients being obese. Cross-validation was performed on the second dataset from an obesity assessment consult at the Pediatric Department of the Hospital General Universitario of Valencia. A total of 27 patients were recruited between 5 and 17 years old; 42% were girls and 63% were obese. The performance of each algorithm was evaluated based on key performance indicators (e.g., area under the curve, accuracy, recall, specificity and positive predicted value). The logistic regression algorithm outperformed (accuracy = 0.79, specificity = 0.96, area under the curve = 0.9, recall = 0.62 and positive predictive value = 0.94) the support vector machine and the AdaBoost algorithm when trained with the CHAT datasets. Cross-validation tests, using the Hospital General de Valencia (HG) dataset, confirmed the higher performance of the logistic regression algorithm in comparison with the others. In addition, only a minor loss of performance (accuracy = 0.75, specificity = 0.88, area under the curve = 0.85, recall = 0.62 and positive predictive value = 0.83) was observed despite the differences between the datasets. The proposed minimally invasive screening tool has shown promising performance when it comes to identifying children at risk of suffering obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Moreover, it is ideal to be implemented in an outpatient consult in primary and secondary care.

Indexed as

machine learningobese pediatric populationobstructive sleep apnea syndromeoxygen saturation signal

Identifiers

PMID33086521
PMCPMC7712243
OpenAlexW3092931717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.