Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33085669›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Occupational bladder cancer: A cross section survey of previous employments, tasks and exposures matched to cancer phenotypes.

Oliver Reed, Ibrahim Jubber, Jon Griffin, Aidan P Noon, Louise Goodwin, Syed Hussain, Marcus G Cumberbatch, James W F Catto

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Worker health risk of heavy metals in pellets of recycled plastic: a skin exposure model.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Oliver ReedAcademic Urology Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6890-1399
Ibrahim JubberAcademic Urology Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Jon GriffinDepartment of Pathology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Aidan P NoonDepartment of Urology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Sheffield, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5999-173X
Louise GoodwinAcademic Urology Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Syed HussainAcademic Oncology Unit, Western Park, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Marcus G CumberbatchAcademic Urology Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
James W F CattoAcademic Urology Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
University of Sheffield · GBSheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre · AU

Funding

Department of Health NIHR300047
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesUp to 10% of Bladder Cancers may arise following occupational exposure to carcinogens. We hypothesised that different cancer phenotypes reflected different patterns of occupational exposure.

methodsConsecutive participants, with bladder cancer, self-completed a structured questionnaire detailing employment, tasks, exposures, smoking, lifestyle and family history. Our primary outcome was association between cancer phenotype and occupational details.

resultsWe collected questionnaires from 536 patients, of whom 454 (85%) participants (352 men and 102 women) were included. Women were less likely to be smokers (68% vs. 81% Chi sq. p<0.001), but more likely than men to inhale environmental tobacco smoke at home (82% vs. 74% p = 0.08) and use hair dye (56% vs. 3%, p<0.001). Contact with potential carcinogens occurred in 282 (62%) participants (mean 3.1 per worker (range 0-14)). High-grade cancer was more common than low-grade disease in workers from the steel, foundry, metal, engineering and transport industries (p<0.05), and in workers exposed to crack detection dyes, chromium, coal/oil/gas by-products, diesel fumes/fuel/aircraft fuel and solvents (such as trichloroethylene). Higher staged cancers were frequent in workers exposed to Chromium, coal products and diesel exhaust fumes/fuel (p<0.05). Various workers (e.g. exposed to diesel fuels or fumes (Cox, HR 1.97 (95% CI 1.31-2.98) p = 0.001), employed in a garage (HR 2.19 (95% CI 1.31-3.63) p = 0.001), undertaking plumbing/gas fitting/ventilation (HR 2.15 (95% CI 1.15-4.01) p = 0.017), undertaking welding (HR 1.85 (95% CI 1.24-2.77) p = 0.003) and exposed to welding materials (HR 1.92 (95% CI 1.27-2.91) p = 0.002)) were more likely to have disease progression and receive radical treatment than others. Fewer than expected deaths were seen in healthcare workers (HR 0.17 (95% CI 0.04-0.70) p = 0.014).

conclusionsWe identified multiple occupational tasks and contacts associated with bladder cancer. There were some associations with phenotype, although our study design precludes robust assessment.

Indexed as

AgedAir Pollutants, OccupationalCarcinogensCross-Sectional StudiesEmploymentFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingOccupational DiseasesOccupational ExposurePhenotypeProgression-Free SurvivalProportional Hazards ModelsSmokingAir Pollutants, OccupationalCarcinogensVehicle Emissions

Identifiers

PMID33085669
PMCPMC7577448
OpenAlexW3094469335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.