ArticleStatistical applications in genetics and molecular biology2020
Bayesian reconstruction of transmission trees from genetic sequences and uncertain infection times.
Article in Statistical applications in genetics and molecular biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bayesian estimation of transmission networks for infectious diseases.Journal of mathematical biology · 2025Article
- Network methods and design of randomized trials: Application to investigation of COVID-19 vaccination boosters.Clinical trials (London, England) · 2022Article
- Methods Combining Genomic and Epidemiological Data in the Reconstruction of Transmission Trees: A Systematic Review.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Statistical outbreak detection by joining medical records and pathogen similarity.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Genetic sequence data of pathogens are increasingly used to investigate transmission dynamics in both endemic diseases and disease outbreaks. Such research can aid in the development of appropriate interventions and in the design of studies to evaluate them. Several computational methods have been proposed to infer transmission chains from sequence data; however, existing methods do not generally reliably reconstruct transmission trees because genetic sequence data or inferred phylogenetic trees from such data contain insufficient information for accurate estimation of transmission chains. Here, we show by simulation studies that incorporating infection times, even when they are uncertain, can greatly improve the accuracy of reconstruction of transmission trees. To achieve this improvement, we propose a Bayesian inference methods using Markov chain Monte Carlo that directly draws samples from the space of transmission trees under the assumption of complete sampling of the outbreak. The likelihood of each transmission tree is computed by a phylogenetic model by treating its internal nodes as transmission events. By a simulation study, we demonstrate that accuracy of the reconstructed transmission trees depends mainly on the amount of information available on times of infection; we show superiority of the proposed method to two alternative approaches when infection times are known up to specified degrees of certainty. In addition, we illustrate the use of a multiple imputation framework to study features of epidemic dynamics, such as the relationship between characteristics of nodes and average number of outbound edges or inbound edges, signifying possible transmission events from and to nodes. We apply the proposed method to a transmission cluster in San Diego and to a dataset from the 2014 Sierra Leone Ebola virus outbreak and investigate the impact of biological, behavioral, and demographic factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.