Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33085052›Full record

ReviewPulmonary therapy2020

Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19: A Narrative Review on Prone Position.

Syeda Kashfi Qadri, Priscilla Ng, Theresa Shu Wen Toh, Sin Wee Loh, Herng Lee Tan, Cheryl Bin Lin, Eddy Fan, Jan Hau Lee

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pulmonary therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Syeda Kashfi QadriChildren's Intensive Care Unit, Department of Pediatric Subspecialties, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, 100 Bukit Timah Road, Singapore, 229899, Singapore. syeda.kashfi.qadri@singhealth.com.sg.
Priscilla NgDuke NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore, 169857, Singapore.
Theresa Shu Wen TohDepartment of Pediatrics, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, 100 Bukit Timah Road, Singapore, 229899, Singapore.
Sin Wee LohDepartment of Pediatrics, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, 100 Bukit Timah Road, Singapore, 229899, Singapore.
Herng Lee TanChildren's Intensive Care Unit, Department of Pediatric Subspecialties, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, 100 Bukit Timah Road, Singapore, 229899, Singapore.
Cheryl Bin LinChildren's Intensive Care Unit, Department of Pediatric Subspecialties, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, 100 Bukit Timah Road, Singapore, 229899, Singapore.
Eddy FanInterdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, 204 Victoria Street, 4th Floor, Room 411, Toronto, ON, M5B1T8, Canada.
Jan Hau LeeChildren's Intensive Care Unit, Department of Pediatric Subspecialties, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, 100 Bukit Timah Road, Singapore, 229899, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionProne position is known to improve mortality in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The impact of prone position in critically ill patients with coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) remains to be determined. In this review, we describe the mechanisms of action of prone position, systematically appraise the current experience of prone position in COVID-19 patients, and highlight unique considerations for prone position practices during this pandemic.

methodsFor our systematic review, we searched PubMed, Scopus and EMBASE from January 1, 2020, to April 16, 2020. After completion of our search, we became aware of four relevant publications during article preparation that were published in May and June 2020, and these studies were reviewed for eligibility and inclusion. We included all studies reporting clinical characteristics of patients admitted to the hospital with COVID-19 disease who received respiratory support with high-flow nasal cannula, or noninvasive or mechanical ventilation and reported the use of prone position. The full text of eligible articles was reviewed, and data regarding study design, patient characteristics, interventions and outcomes were extracted.

resultsWe found seven studies (total 1899 patients) describing prone position in COVID-19. Prone position has been increasingly used in non-intubated patients with COVID-19; studies show high tolerance and improvement in oxygenation and lung recruitment. Published studies lacked a description of important clinical outcomes (e.g., mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation).

conclusionsBased on the findings of our review, we recommend prone position in patients with moderate to severe COVID-19 ARDS as per existing guidelines. A trial of prone position should be considered for non-intubated COVID-19 patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure, as long as this does not result in a delay in intubation.

Indexed as

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)COVID-19EpidemicPandemicProne position

Identifiers

PMID33085052
PMCPMC7575418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.