Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33085039›Full record

SynthesisPituitary2021

HOMA-IR in acromegaly: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Betina Biagetti, Anna Aulinas, Anna Casteras, Santiago Pérez-Hoyos, Rafael Simó

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Pituitary, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Betina BiagettiDiabetes and Metabolism Research Unit, Vall D'Hebron Research Institute and CIBERDEM (ISCIII), Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8837-4343
Anna AulinasDepartment of Endocrinology and Nutrition, Hospital de La Santa Creu I Sant Pau and Sant Pau-Biomedical Research Institute (IIB-Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain.
Anna CasterasDiabetes and Metabolism Research Unit, Vall D'Hebron Research Institute and CIBERDEM (ISCIII), Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Santiago Pérez-HoyosGenetics Microbiology and Statistics Department, Statistics and Bioinformatics Unit, Vall D'Hebron Research Institute, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Rafael SimóDiabetes and Metabolism Research Unit, Vall D'Hebron Research Institute and CIBERDEM (ISCIII), Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. rafael.simo@vhir.org.
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESUniversitat de Vic - Universitat Central de Catalunya · ESVall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis review is aimed at examining whether the Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) is higher in Caucasian, adult, treatment-naïve patients with acromegaly (ACRO) than in the reference population independently of diabetes presence and to evaluate the impact of treatment [surgery and somatostatin analogues (SSAs)] on its assessment.

methodsWe systematically reviewed in PubMed and Web of Science from July 1985 to December 2019, registered with the code number CRD42020148737. The inclusion criteria comprised studies conducted in Caucasian adult treatment-naïve patients with active ACRO in whom HOMA-IR or basal insulin and glucose were reported. Three reviewers screened eligible publications, extracted the outcomes, and assessed the risk of biases.

resultsOf 118 originally selected studies, 15 met the inclusion criteria. HOMA-IR was higher in ACRO than the reference population, with mean difference and (95% confidence intervals) of 2.04 (0.65-3.44), even in ACRO patients without diabetes, 1.89 (1.06-2.73). HOMA-IR significantly decreased after treatment with either surgery or SSAs - 2.53 (- 3.24- - 1.81) and - 2.30 (- 3.05- - 1.56); respectively. However, the reduction of HOMA-IR due to SSAs did not improve basal glucose.

conclusionHOMA-IR in treatment-naïve ACRO patients is higher than in the reference population, even in patients without diabetes. This finding, confirms that insulin resistance is an early event in ACRO. Our results also suggest that HOMA-IR is not an adequate tool for assessing insulin resistance in those patients treated with SSAs.

Indexed as

AcromegalyDiabetes MellitusHumansInsulin ResistanceAcromegalyDiabetes mellitusHOMAInsulin resistanceMeta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID33085039
OpenAlexW3094496486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.