Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33085008›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2021

Enhanced arsenate removal by Fe-impregnated canola straw: assessment of XANES solid-phase speciation, impacts of solution properties, sorption mechanisms, and evolutionary polynomial regression (EPR) models.

Khaled Zoroufchi Benis, Mohsen Shakouri, Kerry McPhedran, Jafar Soltan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Khaled Zoroufchi BenisDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Mohsen ShakouriCanadian Light Source, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Kerry McPhedranDepartment of Civil, Geological & Environmental Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, 57 Campus Dr, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 5A9, Canada. Kerry.mcphedran@usask.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9718-6793
Jafar SoltanDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
University of Saskatchewan · CA

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Discovery GrantUniversity of Saskatchewan Dean's Scholarship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The impact of arsenic (As) contamination of water is an ongoing concern worldwide with As released from anthropogenic activities including mining and agriculture. Biosorption is a promising As treatment methodology used currently for arsenate (As(V)) sorption from water. The biosorbent was developed by a simple and inexpensive treatment of coating of canola straw particles with iron hydroxides. The modification procedure was optimized with consideration of the concentration of iron solution, pH of modification process, and sonication time. A higher concentration of iron and lower pH led to an improved sorption capacity of the iron-loaded canola straw (ICS), while impacts of sonication time were not conclusive. Pareto analyses indicated that the magnitude of the effect of the pH was higher than that of the iron concentration. Overall, the maximum As(V) sorption capacity of the ICS was 5.5 mg/g for an 0.25 M FeCl

Indexed as

ArsenicWater Pollutants, ChemicalWater PurificationAdsorptionArsenatesHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationKineticsThermodynamicsArsenatesArsenicWater Pollutants, ChemicalArsenic sorptionCanola strawIron loadingXANES

Identifiers

PMID33085008
OpenAlexW3093550516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.