Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33085001›Full record

ReviewCurrent osteoporosis reports2020

Biological Response to Nanosurface Modification on Metallic Biomaterials.

Patricia Capellato, Samira Esteves Afonso Camargo, Daniela Sachs

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current osteoporosis reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Patricia CapellatoInstitute of Physics and Chemistry, Unifei- Federal University of Itajubá, Av. BPS, 1303, Itajubá, MG, 37500 903, Brazil. pat_capellato@yahoo.com.br.ORCID 0000-0002-6397-5820
Samira Esteves Afonso CamargoRestorative Dental Sciences, Division of Prosthodontics, University of Florida, College of Dentistry, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Daniela SachsInstitute of Physics and Chemistry, Unifei- Federal University of Itajubá, Av. BPS, 1303, Itajubá, MG, 37500 903, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewNew biomaterials for biomedical applications have been developed over the past few years. This work summarizes the current cell lines investigations regarding nanosurface modifications to improve biocompatibility and osseointegration. RECENT

findingsMaterial surfaces presenting biomimetic morphology that provides nanoscale architectures have been shown to alter cell/biomaterial interactions. Topographical and biofunctional surface modifications present a positive effect between material and host response. Nanoscale surfaces on titanium have the potential to provide a successful interface for implantable biomedical devices. Future studies need to directly evaluate how the titanium nanoscale materials will perform in in vivo experiments. Biocompatibility should be determined to identify titanium nanoscale as an excellent option for implant procedures.

Indexed as

Prostheses and ImplantsAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsCell LineCell ProliferationHumansNanostructuresOsseointegrationSurface PropertiesTitaniumBiocompatible MaterialsTitaniumBiocompatibleBoneImplantsNanomaterialsTitanium

Identifiers

PMID33085001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.