Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33084987›Full record

ArticleSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2021

Obstructive sleep apnea in people with intellectual disabilities: adherence to and effect of CPAP.

Naomi van den Broek, L Broer, N Vandenbussche, I Tan, S Overeem, S Pillen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Respiratory support in patients with Down syndrome: a systematic review.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Adults with Down syndrome and obstructive sleep apnea treated with hypoglossal nerve stimulation.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Naomi van den BroekKempenhaeghe, Sleep Medicine Centre, Heeze, The Netherlands. broekn@kempenhaeghe.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3672-621X
L BroerFaculty of Health, Medicine & Life sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
N VandenbusscheKempenhaeghe, Sleep Medicine Centre, Heeze, The Netherlands.
I TanKempenhaeghe, Center for Residential Epilepsy Care, Heeze, The Netherlands.
S OvereemKempenhaeghe, Sleep Medicine Centre, Heeze, The Netherlands.
S PillenKempenhaeghe, Sleep Medicine Centre, Heeze, The Netherlands.
Kempenhaeghe · NLMaastricht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeObstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is common in people with intellectual disabilities (ID), but in practice continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is often deemed unfeasible. We investigated adherence to and effect of CPAP in patients with ID and OSA.

methodsPatients with ID were started on CPAP using an intensive training program. Acceptable adherence was defined as use of ≥ 4 h/night during ≥ 70% of the nights. Treatment effect was measured with a patient global impression scale and customized questionnaires. Reasons for not starting CPAP, factors influencing treatment, and reasons for terminating CPAP were explored.

resultsOf 39 patients with ID, 87% after 8-10 weeks and 70% at 8 months still used CPAP, of whom 74% and 77% showed acceptable adherence. Baseline apnea-hypopnea (AHI) index decreased from 41.2/h to 5.3/h after 8-10 weeks (p < 0.001), and 4.3/h after 8 months (p < 0.001). At 8-10 weeks and after 8 months, there was an improvement in the most restrictive reported complaint (both p < 0.0005), difficulty waking up (p < 0.01; p < 0.0005), handling behavior (p < 0.03; p < 0.02), presence of irritability (p < 0.01), and sleepiness (p < 0.05). The expectation that CPAP would not be tolerated was the main reason for not starting. CPAP use in the first 2 weeks predicted adherence at 8-10 weeks and 8 months (r = 0.51, p < 0.01; r = 0.69, p < 0.01). Of 13 patients who terminated CPAP, the reasons for termination included behavioral problems, comorbid insomnia, anxiety, discomfort, or other side effects.

conclusionsWith adequate guidance, CPAP is both feasible and effective in people with ID and OSA.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedChildContinuous Positive Airway PressureFemaleHumansIntellectual DisabilityMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSleep Apnea, ObstructiveTreatment Adherence and ComplianceTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultContinuous positive airway pressureIntellectual disabilitiesObstructive sleep apnea

Identifiers

PMID33084987
OpenAlexW3093820012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.