Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33084970›Full record

ReviewDiabetologia2021

Presumption of guilt for T cells in type 1 diabetes: lead culprits or partners in crime depending on age of onset?

Alexia Carré, Sarah J Richardson, Etienne Larger, Roberto Mallone

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diabetologia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Frontiers in endocrinology · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. CD8Diabetes · 2021
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Alexia CarréUniversité de Paris, Institut Cochin, CNRS, INSERM, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8144-7194
Sarah J RichardsonInstitute of Biomedical and Clinical Science, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK. s.richardson@exeter.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-1160-6062
Etienne LargerUniversité de Paris, Institut Cochin, CNRS, INSERM, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1017-1845
Roberto MalloneUniversité de Paris, Institut Cochin, CNRS, INSERM, Paris, France. roberto.mallone@inserm.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-9846-8861
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversity of Exeter · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/P010695/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Available evidence provides arguments both for and against a primary pathogenic role for T cells in human type 1 diabetes. Genetic susceptibility linked to HLA Class II lends strong support. Histopathology documents HLA Class I hyperexpression and islet infiltrates dominated by CD8

Indexed as

Age of OnsetAdolescentAdultAnimalsAutoimmunityCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseHistocompatibility Antigens Class IHistocompatibility Antigens Class IIHumansIslets of LangerhansMiceT-LymphocytesYoung AdultHistocompatibility Antigens Class IHistocompatibility Antigens Class IIAutoantibodiesAutoimmunityBeta cellsEndotypesHLAImmunotherapyInsulitisIsletsPancreasReviewT cells

Identifiers

PMID33084970
PMCPMC7717061
OpenAlexW3094217856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.