Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33084936›Full record

SynthesisNeuroradiology2021

Influence of first-pass effect on recanalization outcomes in the era of mechanical thrombectomy: a systemic review and meta-analysis.

Xuesong Bai, Xiao Zhang, Wuyang Yang, Yinhang Zhang, Tao Wang, Ran Xu, Yan Wang, Long Li, Yao Feng, Kun Yang and 4 more

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neuroradiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. The use of the NeVa stent-retriever for bail-out mechanical thrombectomy.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Influencing factors of futile recanalization after endovascular intervention in patients with acute basilar artery occlusion.Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Xuesong BaiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Xiao ZhangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Wuyang YangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Yinhang ZhangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Tao WangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Ran XuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yan WangChina Medical University, No.77 Puhe Road, Shenyang North New Area, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China.
Long LiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yao FengDepartment of Neurosurgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Kun YangDepartment of Evidence-Based Medicine, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Xue WangMedical Library, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Haiqing SongDepartment of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Qingfeng MaDepartment of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Liqun JiaoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. liqunjiao@126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4982-6295

Funding

National Key Research and Development Project 2016YFC1301703
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis systematic review and meta-analysis summarized the current literature to compare the safety and efficacy between first-pass effect (FPE) and multiple-pass effect (MPE) for thrombectomy in treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS).

methodsMajor databases were searched for studies which reported clinical outcomes regarding successful or complete recanalization after first pass of mechanical thrombectomy in AIS. The assessment of bias was performed using different scales. I

resultsA total of 9 studies were eligible for final analysis. For successful recanalization (mTICI 2b-3), favorable outcomes were seen in 49.7% (95% confidence interval (CI): 40.5-58.9%) and 34.7% (95% CI: 26.8-42.7%) of FPE and MPE patients, respectively. Mortality at 3 months was 13.8% (95% CI: 10.8-16.9%) and 26.0% (95% CI: 17.7-34.2%), respectively. For complete recanalization (mTICI 2c-3), proportion of favorable outcomes were 62.7% (95% CI: 51.2-74.2%) and 47.7% (95% CI: 37.4-58.0%) in FPE and MPE; mortality was seen in 11.5% (95% CI: 4.9-18.2%) and 17.0% (95% CI: 5.2-28.7%), respectively. For AIS with successful recanalization, FPE had more favorable outcome (odds ratio (OR): 1.85, 95% CI: 1.48-2.30; p < 0.01; I

conclusionFPE is associated with better outcomes than MPE after achieving successful or complete recanalization.

Indexed as

Brain IschemiaIschemic StrokeStrokeHumansThrombectomyTreatment OutcomeAcute ischemic strokeFirst-pass effectMechanical thrombectomyMultiple-pass effectRecanalization outcomesSystematic review

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.