Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33084907›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2020

Mechanisms coordinating ribosomal protein gene transcription in response to stress.

Sevil Zencir, Daniel Dilg, Maria Paula Rueda, David Shore, Benjamin Albert

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. RiboScreenBiomedicines · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Ribosome Structural Changes Dynamically Affect Ribosome Function.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sevil ZencirDepartment of Molecular Biology and Institute of Genetics and Genomics of Geneva (iGE3), University of Geneva, 30 quai Ernest-Ansermet, 1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland.
Daniel DilgDepartment of Molecular Biology and Institute of Genetics and Genomics of Geneva (iGE3), University of Geneva, 30 quai Ernest-Ansermet, 1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland.
Maria Paula RuedaDepartment of Molecular Biology and Institute of Genetics and Genomics of Geneva (iGE3), University of Geneva, 30 quai Ernest-Ansermet, 1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland.
David ShoreDepartment of Molecular Biology and Institute of Genetics and Genomics of Geneva (iGE3), University of Geneva, 30 quai Ernest-Ansermet, 1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland.
Benjamin AlbertDepartment of Molecular Biology and Institute of Genetics and Genomics of Geneva (iGE3), University of Geneva, 30 quai Ernest-Ansermet, 1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland.
University of Geneva · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While expression of ribosomal protein genes (RPGs) in the budding yeast has been extensively studied, a longstanding enigma persists regarding their co-regulation under fluctuating growth conditions. Most RPG promoters display one of two distinct arrangements of a core set of transcription factors (TFs) and are further differentiated by the presence or absence of the HMGB protein Hmo1. However, a third group of promoters appears not to be bound by any of these proteins, raising the question of how the whole suite of genes is co-regulated. We demonstrate here that all RPGs are regulated by two distinct, but complementary mechanisms driven by the TFs Ifh1 and Sfp1, both of which are required for maximal expression in optimal conditions and coordinated downregulation upon stress. At the majority of RPG promoters, Ifh1-dependent regulation predominates, whereas Sfp1 plays the major role at all other genes. We also uncovered an unexpected protein homeostasis-dependent binding property of Hmo1 at RPG promoters. Finally, we show that the Ifh1 paralog Crf1, previously described as a transcriptional repressor, can act as a constitutive RPG activator. Our study provides a more complete picture of RPG regulation and may serve as a paradigm for unravelling RPG regulation in multicellular eukaryotes.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, FungalTranscription, GeneticChromatin Immunoprecipitation SequencingDNA-Binding ProteinsHigh Mobility Group ProteinsMechanistic Target of Rapamycin Complex 1Promoter Regions, GeneticRepressor ProteinsRibosomal ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSirolimusStress, PhysiologicalTrans-ActivatorsCRF1 protein, S cerevisiaeDNA-Binding ProteinsHigh Mobility Group ProteinsHMO1 protein, S cerevisiaeIFH1 protein, S cerevisiaeMechanistic Target of Rapamycin Complex 1Repressor ProteinsRibosomal ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSFP1 protein, S cerevisiaeSirolimusTrans-Activators

Identifiers

PMID33084907
PMCPMC7672434
OpenAlexW3094615982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.