Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33084777›Full record

ArticleRevista latino-americana de enfermagem2020

Classification and evaluation of the environment of the professional nursing practice in a teaching hospital.

Dilzabeth Margot Imata Yanarico, Alexandre Pazetto Balsanelli, Renata Cristina Gasparino, Elena Bohomol

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista latino-americana de enfermagem, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dilzabeth Margot Imata YanaricoUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Escola Paulista de Enfermagem, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8282-2371
Alexandre Pazetto BalsanelliUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Escola Paulista de Enfermagem, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3757-1061
Renata Cristina GasparinoUniversidade Estadual de Campinas, Faculdade de Enfermagem, Campinas, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8729-4707
Elena BohomolUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Escola Paulista de Enfermagem, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7196-0266
Universidade Federal de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveto classify and evaluate the environment of the professional nursing practice in a teaching hospital.

methoda cross-sectional study conducted with 188 nurses from a teaching hospital in the state of São Paulo, SP, Brazil. A questionnaire with sociodemographic and professional data and the Brazilian version of the Practice Environment Scale were used to classify and evaluate the environment of the professional nursing practice. Data was analyzed using Student's t-test, analysis of variance, Mann-Whitney, and Kruskal-Wallis tests with a significance level of 5% (p<0.05). The internal consistency of the instrument was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha.

resultsthe score's mean for the Brazilian version of the Practice Environment Scale was 2.54, and the participants considered two of the five subscales as unfavorable for the practice, namely: subscale 1, "Nurse Participation in Hospital Affairs" (2.37), and subscale 4, "Staffing and Resource Adequacy" (2.23).

conclusionthe environment of the professional nursing practice has been classified as mixed, being evaluated with favorable conditions for the nursing practice, but the participation and involvement of nurses in hospital matters and the adequacy of resources to provide quality care need improvements.

Indexed as

Hospitals, TeachingBrazilCross-Sectional StudiesHumansSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID33084777
PMCPMC7575241
OpenAlexW3093531328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.