Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33084735›Full record

ArticleActa cirurgica brasileira2020

The examination of the nephroprotective effect of montelukast sodium and N-acetylcysteine ın renal ıschemia with dimercaptosuccinic acid imaging in a placebo-controlled rat model.

Arif Aydin, Mehmet Melih Sunay, Tolga Karakan, Serkan Özcan, Ahmet Metin Hasçiçek, İbrahim Yardimci, Hatice Surer, Meliha Korkmaz, Sema Hücümenoğlu, Emre Huri

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta cirurgica brasileira, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The renoprotective potential of montelukast: a scoping review.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2024
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Arif AydinMD, NEÜ Meram Medicine Faculty Department of Urology, Konya, Turkey. Design of the study, acquisition of data, manuscript writing.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8691-090X
Mehmet Melih SunayMD, Professor, Karabük University Medicine Faculty Department of Urology, Karabük, Turkey. Manuscript preparation.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1917-927X
Tolga KarakanMD, Associate Professor, Ankara Training and Research Hospital, Clinic of Urology, Ankara, Turkey. Design of the study.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6694-8369
Serkan ÖzcanMD, İzmir Katip Çelebi University Department of Urology, İzmir, Turkey. Analysis of data.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2459-139X
Ahmet Metin HasçiçekMD, Ankara Training and Research Hospital, Clinic of Urology, Ankara, Turkey. Acquisition of data.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2137-4530
İbrahim YardimciMD, Adana Çukurova State Hospital, Clinic of Urology, Adana, Turkey. Scientific and intellectual content of the study, acquisition of data.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2784-5631
Hatice SurerMD, Ankara Training and Research Hospital, Department of Biochemistry, Ankara, Turkey. Analysis of data.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6899-3115
Meliha KorkmazMD, Professor, Ankara Training and Research Hospital, Department of Pathology, Ankara, Turkey. Analysis of data.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3251-3738
Sema HücümenoğluMD, Professor, Ankara Training and Research Hospital, Department of Pathology, Ankara, Turkey. Analysis of data.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6898-4101
Emre HuriPhD, Associate Professor, Hacettepe University, Department of Urology, Ankara, Turkey. Manuscript writing.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5563-4527
Ministry of Health · TRCukurova University · TRHacettepe University · TRIzmir Kâtip Çelebi University · TRKarabük University · TRKonya Food and Agriculture University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine the nephroprotective effect of NAC and Montelukast Sodium administration against the development of renal damage associated with long warm renal ischemia.

methodsTwenty-seven rats were randomly divided into 3 study groups, which received NAC, montelukast and placebo, and 3 rats were included in the sham-treated control group. Medications were given 3 days before the procedure. DMSA renal scintigraphy was performed before and after surgery. The right renal pedicle was occluded for 45 min to induce ischemia and then subjected to reperfusion for 6 h (I/R groups).

resultsOn pathological examination, the mean pathological scores of the montelukast and NAC groups were significantly lower than those of the placebo group. (p <0.05). In biochemical examination, significant differences were found in all parameter levels between the placebo group and the montelukast and NAC groups. (p <0.05) When postoperative DMSA renal scintigraphy measurements and renal function levels were compared, significant differences were found between the montelukast and NAC groups and the placebo and sham groups.

conclusionThe administration of NAC and montelukast sodium was seen to have a nephroprotective effect against the development of renal damage associated with warm renal ischemia.

Indexed as

AcetatesAcetylcysteineQuinolinesReperfusion InjuryAnimalsCyclopropanesKidneyRatsRats, WistarSuccimerSulfidesTomography, X-Ray ComputedAcetatesAcetylcysteineCyclopropanesmontelukastQuinolinesSuccimerSulfides

Identifiers

PMID33084735
PMCPMC7584297
OpenAlexW3094475918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.