ArticleJMIR medical informatics2020
AutoScore: A Machine Learning-Based Automatic Clinical Score Generator and Its Application to Mortality Prediction Using Electronic Health Records.
Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
77 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Investigating Machine Learning Techniques for Predicting Risk of Asthma Exacerbations: A Systematic Review.Journal of medical systems · 2024Pooled it
- Development and assessment of scoring model for ICU stay and mortality prediction after emergency admissions in ischemic heart disease: a retrospective study of MIMIC-IV databases.Internal and emergency medicine · 2023Trial
- Unraveling the Metabolic-Cardiovascular Disease Nexus: An Epidemiological Network Analysis Identifies Central Indicators.MedComm · 2026Article
- Article
- A machine learning-based score to predict live birth after mosaic embryo transfer.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026Observational
- Interpretable Machine Learning Model for Predicting Sepsis and Septic Shock Among Patients with Documented Fever at Emergency Department Triage Using Patients' Historical Data.Journal of medical systems · 2026Article
- Analysis of health anxiety trajectories in rabies exposure patients based on machine learning.BMC public health · 2026Article
- A machine learning-based screening tool for classifying post-traumatic stress disorder in firefighters: Firefighter Latent Risk Evaluation (FLARE).BMC psychiatry · 2026Article
- The SUPREME Index for 30-day all-cause readmission: development and internal validation of a machine learning-based risk stratification index in community-dwelling adults.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Predicting Hungry Bone Syndrome with Interpretable Machine Learning: A Single-Center Cohort of Dialysis Patients Undergoing Parathyroidectomy.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a bacteremia prediction score for adult emergency department patients using hybrid machine learning and regression.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Derivation and validation of a machine learning-driven score to predict the diagnostic yield of endomyocardial biopsy.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Development of a machine learning-based sepsis prediction model for real-world clinical settings in South Korea: a single-center retrospective study.Journal of Korean biological nursing science · 2026Article
- Development and validation of an interpretable clinical scoring model to monitor the progression of preclinical Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2025Article
- Unveiling Predictors of Hypoalbuminemia Following One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB): A Retrospective Analysis.Obesity surgery · 2025Article
- Development and Validation of a Hybrid Machine Learning Model to Predict Lung Transplant Outcomes.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Discriminative Accuracy of CHA2DS2-VASc Score, and Development of Predictive Accuracy Model Using Machine Learning for Ischemic Stroke Risk in Cardiac Amyloidosis and Atrial Fibrillation.Cardiology research · 2025Article
- Predicting severity of cerebral amyloid angiopathy neuropathology: A modeling approach using NACC and ROSMAP data.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Article
- Development of Simple Risk Scores for Prediction of Brain β-Amyloid and Tau Status in Older Adults With Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Machine Learning Approach.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2025Article
- The MEFIER Score-A Risk Score to Stratify Infective Endocarditis in Patients WithOpen forum infectious diseases · 2025Article
17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRisk scores can be useful in clinical risk stratification and accurate allocations of medical resources, helping health providers improve patient care. Point-based scores are more understandable and explainable than other complex models and are now widely used in clinical decision making. However, the development of the risk scoring model is nontrivial and has not yet been systematically presented, with few studies investigating methods of clinical score generation using electronic health records.
objectiveThis study aims to propose AutoScore, a machine learning-based automatic clinical score generator consisting of 6 modules for developing interpretable point-based scores. Future users can employ the AutoScore framework to create clinical scores effortlessly in various clinical applications.
methodsWe proposed the AutoScore framework comprising 6 modules that included variable ranking, variable transformation, score derivation, model selection, score fine-tuning, and model evaluation. To demonstrate the performance of AutoScore, we used data from the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center to build a scoring model for mortality prediction and then compared the data with other baseline models using the receiver operating characteristic analysis. A software package in R 3.5.3 (R Foundation) was also developed to demonstrate the implementation of AutoScore.
resultsImplemented on the data set with 44,918 individual admission episodes of intensive care, the AutoScore-created scoring models performed comparably well as other standard methods (ie, logistic regression, stepwise regression, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, and random forest) in terms of predictive accuracy and model calibration but required fewer predictors and presented high interpretability and accessibility. The nine-variable, AutoScore-created, point-based scoring model achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.780 (95% CI 0.764-0.798), whereas the model of logistic regression with 24 variables had an AUC of 0.778 (95% CI 0.760-0.795). Moreover, the AutoScore framework also drives the clinical research continuum and automation with its integration of all necessary modules.
conclusionsWe developed an easy-to-use, machine learning-based automatic clinical score generator, AutoScore; systematically presented its structure; and demonstrated its superiority (predictive performance and interpretability) over other conventional methods using a benchmark database. AutoScore will emerge as a potential scoring tool in various medical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.