Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33084576›Full record

SynthesiseLife2020

An interactive meta-analysis of MRI biomarkers of myelin.

Matteo Mancini, Agah Karakuzu, Julien Cohen-Adad, Mara Cercignani, Thomas E Nichols, Nikola Stikov

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in eLife, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 106 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
106citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

106 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Investigating hierarchical critical periods in human neurodevelopment.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Remyelination therapies are achievable in clinical practice-Commentary.Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England) · 2026
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

46 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Matteo ManciniDepartment of Neuroscience, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7194-4568
Agah KarakuzuNeuroPoly Lab, Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7283-271X
Julien Cohen-AdadNeuroPoly Lab, Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3662-9532
Mara CercignaniDepartment of Neuroscience, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4550-2456
Thomas E Nichols *Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging (WIN FMRIB), University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4516-5103
Nikola Stikov *NeuroPoly Lab, Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8480-5230

Funding

Large-scale meta-analysis of functional MRI dataR01MH096906 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI Alejandro De La Vega · 2012 to 2026
$7.9M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH096906Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 213722/Z/18/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several MRI measures have been proposed as in vivo biomarkers of myelin, each with applications ranging from plasticity to pathology. Despite the availability of these myelin-sensitive modalities, specificity and sensitivity have been a matter of discussion. Debate about which MRI measure is the most suitable for quantifying myelin is still ongoing. In this study, we performed a systematic review of published quantitative validation studies to clarify how different these measures are when compared to the underlying histology. We analyzed the results from 43 studies applying meta-analysis tools, controlling for study sample size and using interactive visualization (https://neurolibre.github.io/myelin-meta-analysis). We report the overall estimates and the prediction intervals for the coefficient of determination and find that MT and relaxometry-based measures exhibit the highest correlations with myelin content. We also show which measures are, and which measures are not statistically different regarding their relationship with histology.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingAnimalsBiomarkersHumansMiceMyelin SheathRatsBiomarkersbraincentral nervous systemhistologyhumanmeta-analysismouseMRImyelinneurosciencerat

Identifiers

PMID33084576
PMCPMC7647401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.