ArticleOrthopaedic surgery2020
Loss of Reduction after Cephalomedullary Nail Fixation of Intertrochanteric Femoral Fracture: A Brief Report.
Article in Orthopaedic surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cephalomedullary nailing of trochanteric fractures in geriatric patients restores natural hip geometry - a retrospective radiological analysis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
- Biomechanical comparison of cephalomedullary and reconstruction nails used in the treatment of subtrochanteric femur fractures.OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma · 2025Article
- The role of postoperative piriformis fossa and greater trochanter tubercle distance to predict cutout failure after cephalomedullary nail fixation.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2024Article
- Is Nail-Canal Diameter Discordance a Risk Factor for the Excessive Sliding of Cephalomedullary Nails in Geriatric Intertrochanteric Fracture Surgery?Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveAt present, cephalomedullary nail is the most frequently used implant in the management of intertrochanteric fractures around the world. The implant design and fixation techniques of the cephalomedullary nail have been continuously improved to ensure uncomplicated bone union during the past decade. However, a degree of reduction loss during bone healing is still not rare in clinical work. Many attributed this complication to misoperation during the surgery and hold that a series of techniques and tips could help to avoid the loss of reduction. However, until now there has been no research to explore whether the reduction loss after the operation can be fully prevented in the best cases. The purposes of the study are as follows: (i) to evaluate the efficiency of the current established CMN techniques; (ii) to quantify the loss of reduction under an appropriately implanted CMN to anatomically realigned intertrochanteric fractures; and (iii) to explore the possible underlying causes for the inevitable loss of reduction.
methodsIn the retrospective study, 163 consecutive cases with the intertrochanteric fractures fixed with standard cephalomedullary nail technique were reviewed. The anatomical reduction and optimal positioning of the nail were confirmed by postoperative imaging. The fracture types ranged from 31-A1.1-2.3 according to the OTA/AO fracture classification. One hundred and fifteen cases with stable fracture types (31A1.1-2.1) were allocated to Group A, and 48 cases with unstable 31A2.2-2.3 fracture types were allocated to Group B. The radiological measurements included femoral neck shortening, loss of the neck-shaft angle, cutout, and cut-through of the blade. The outcomes between postoperative and 1 year after the operation were evaluated and compared.
resultsThe patients consisted of 66 males and 97 females with an average age of 69.4 (range: 46-78, SD: 14.6) years. At the 1-year follow-up, no fixation failure or nonunion was observed in each group. The mean femoral neck shortening and loss of the neck-shaft angle were 4.47 mm (range: 0.43-17.68, SD: 3.71) and 5.4° (range: 0.51-19.10, SD: 3.58) separately. The mean cutout and cut-through were 1.84 mm (range: 0.24-11.30, SD: 2.33) and 1.25 mm (range: 0.51-10.29, SD: 1.74). The average femoral neck shortening and loss of the neck-shaft angle were higher in Group B than Group A. Among the 23 cases with the femoral neck shortening more than 10 mm, 19 cases (16.5%) were from Group A and four cases (8.3%) were from Group B. There were nine (7.8%) cases with the loss of the neck-shaft angle more than 10° in Group A and six (12.5%) cases in Group B.
conclusionsCurrent established CMN techniques are efficient in treating intertrochanteric femoral fracture. However, even with currently consensual techniques of cephalomedullary nail, the process of fracture healing still risks the loss of reduction, although the migration of the blade could be minimized. This situation may associate with the intrinsic design of the CMN and further improvement is still needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.