Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33084153›Full record

ReviewRisk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis2021

A Health Economic Analysis for Oral Poliovirus Vaccine to Prevent COVID-19 in the United States.

Kimberly M Thompson, Dominika A Kalkowska, Kamran Badizadegan

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Coordinated global cessation of oral poliovirus vaccine use: Options and potential consequences.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2024
    Review
  6. Nexus between drivers of COVID-19 and country risks.Socio-economic planning sciences · 2023
    Article
  7. Review on Approved and Inprogress COVID-19 Vaccines.Iranian journal of pharmaceutical research : IJPR · 2022
    Review
  8. COVID-19: Some unresolved issues.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Prioritizing Multidimensional Interdependent Factors Influencing COVID-19 Risk.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2022
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. An Updated Economic Analysis of the Global Polio Eradication Initiative.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2021
    Article
  17. Modeling and Managing Poliovirus Risks: We are Where we are….Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kimberly M ThompsonKid Risk, Inc., Orlando, Florida, 32819, USA.
Dominika A KalkowskaKid Risk, Inc., Orlando, Florida, 32819, USA.
Kamran BadizadeganKid Risk, Inc., Orlando, Florida, 32819, USA.
AdventHealth Orlando · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

COVID-19 led to a recent high-profile proposal to reintroduce oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) in the United States (U.S.), initially in clinical trials, but potentially for widespread and repeated use. We explore logistical challenges related to U.S. OPV administration in 2020, review the literature related to nonspecific effects of OPV to induce innate immunity, and model the health and economic implications of the proposal. The costs of reintroducing a single OPV dose to 331 million Americans would exceed $4.4 billion. Giving a dose of bivalent OPV to the entire U.S. population would lead to an expected 40 identifiable cases of vaccine-associated paralytic polio, with young Americans at the highest risk. Reintroducing any OPV use in the U.S. poses a risk of restarting transmission of OPV-related viruses and could lead to new infections in immunocompromised individuals with B-cell related primary immunodeficiencies that could lead to later cases of paralysis. Due to the lack of a currently licensed OPV in the U.S., the decision to administer OPV to Americans for nonspecific immunological effects would require purchasing limited global OPV supplies that could impact polio eradication efforts. Health economic modeling suggests no role for reintroducing OPV into the U.S. with respect to responding to COVID-19. Countries that currently use OPV experience fundamentally different risks, costs, and benefits than the U.S. Successful global polio eradication will depend on sufficient OPV supplies, achieving and maintaining high OPV coverage in OPV-using countries, and effective global OPV cessation and containment in all countries, including the U.S.

Indexed as

Economics, MedicalClinical Trials as TopicCOVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesDisease EradicationDisease OutbreaksFemaleGlobal HealthHealth Care CostsHumansMalePoliomyelitisPoliovirus Vaccine, OralRisk ManagementUnited StatesVaccinationCOVID-19 VaccinesPoliovirus Vaccine, OralCOVID-19health economicsoral poliovirus vaccinepolio

Identifiers

PMID33084153
PMCPMC7983986
OpenAlexW3093928668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.