Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33084102›Full record

ReviewThe European journal of neuroscience2021

Go with the flow: A neuroscientific view on being fully engaged.

Dimitri van der Linden, Mattie Tops, Arnold B Bakker

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The European journal of neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Practicing Emotional Self-awareness to Build Surgeon Resilience.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Creative therapy in health and disease: Inner vision.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The light side of gaming: creativity and brain plasticity.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Dimitri van der LindenDepartment of Psychology, Education, and Child Studies, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7098-8948
Mattie TopsDevelopmental and Educational Psychology Unit, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7861-9661
Arnold B BakkerDepartment of Psychology, Education, and Child Studies, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1489-1847
Erasmus University Rotterdam · NLLeiden University · NLUniversity of Johannesburg · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Flow is a state of full task absorption, accompanied with a strong drive and low levels of self-referential thinking. Flow is likely when there is a match between a person's skills and the task challenge. Despite its relevance for human performance and the vast body of research on flow, there is currently still relatively little insight in its underlying neurocognitive mechanisms. In this paper, we discuss a set of large brain networks that may be involved in establishing the core dimensions of flow. We propose that dopaminergic and noradrenergic systems mediate the intrinsic motivation and activate mood states that are typical for flow. The interaction between three large-scale attentional networks, namely the Default Mode Network, Central Executive Network and the Salience Network is proposed to play a role in the strong task engagement, low self-referential thinking, feedback and feelings of control in flow. The proposed relationships between flow and the brain networks may support the generation of new hypotheses and can guide future research in this field.

Indexed as

Brain MappingMagnetic Resonance ImagingAttentionBrainHumansbrain networksflowneuroscience of optimal performancetask engagement

Identifiers

PMID33084102
PMCPMC7983950
OpenAlexW3093497415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.