What is the optimal activity ratio for same-day myocardial perfusion SPECT?

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Data-driven motion correction rescues interpretation of rubidium PET scan with extreme breathing artifacts.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023
   Article
2. The prevalence of image degradation due to motion in rest-stress rubidium-82 imaging on a SiPM PET-CT system.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022
   Article
3. Moving forward with motion reduction, detection and correction in cardiac PET.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Optimal2021

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as