Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33083969›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2020

Toward interprofessional team training for surgeons and anesthesiologists using virtual reality.

Vuthea Chheang, Virve Fischer, Holger Buggenhagen, Tobias Huber, Florentine Huettl, Werner Kneist, Bernhard Preim, Patrick Saalfeld, Christian Hansen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Extended reality in anesthesia: a narrative review.Korean journal of anesthesiology · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. The use of extended reality in anesthesiology education: a scoping review.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Measuring Quality at the Surgeon Level.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2023
    Review
  8. Review
  9. The silver lining of the pandemic in surgical education: virtual surgical education and recommendations for best practices.Global surgical education : journal of the Association for Surgical Education · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Vuthea ChheangFaculty of Computer Science and Research Campus STIMULATE, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Virve FischerFaculty of Computer Science and Research Campus STIMULATE, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Holger BuggenhagenDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Medicine of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Tobias HuberDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Medicine of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Florentine HuettlDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Medicine of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Werner KneistDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Medicine of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Bernhard PreimFaculty of Computer Science and Research Campus STIMULATE, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Patrick SaalfeldFaculty of Computer Science and Research Campus STIMULATE, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Christian HansenFaculty of Computer Science and Research Campus STIMULATE, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany. hansen@isg.cs.uni-magdeburg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5734-7529

Funding

Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) 16SV8054
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn this work, a virtual environment for interprofessional team training in laparoscopic surgery is proposed. Our objective is to provide a tool to train and improve intraoperative communication between anesthesiologists and surgeons during laparoscopic procedures.

methodsAn anesthesia simulation software and laparoscopic simulation software are combined within a multi-user virtual reality (VR) environment. Furthermore, two medical training scenarios for communication training between anesthesiologists and surgeons are proposed and evaluated. Testing was conducted and social presence was measured. In addition, clinical feedback from experts was collected by following a think-aloud protocol and through structured interviews.

resultsOur prototype is assessed as a reasonable basis for training and extensive clinical evaluation. Furthermore, the results of testing revealed a high degree of exhilaration and social presence of the involved physicians. Valuable insights were gained from the interviews and the think-aloud protocol with the experts of anesthesia and surgery that showed the feasibility of team training in VR, the usefulness of the system for medical training, and current limitations.

conclusionThe proposed VR prototype provides a new basis for interprofessional team training in surgery. It engages the training of problem-based communication during surgery and might open new directions for operating room training.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceComputer SimulationVirtual RealityAnesthesiologistsHumansLaparoscopyOperating RoomsSurgeonsUser-Computer InterfaceHuman–computer interactionMedical trainingMixed realitySurgical simulationVirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID33083969
PMCPMC7671979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.